Paste the claim, quote, or draft plus sources you trust. Map what is supported, what is uncertain, and what still needs evidence—then revise before you publish.
News fact-checkers judge public statements against published reporting. This fact checker is for your draft: paste the exact sentence under review plus quotes, data, or notes you already trust. Empty “is this true?” prompts force guesses. For long background reading first, use the PDF Summarizer or Text Summarizer.
Ask for supported facts, weakly supported lines, missing context, and open questions in separate lists. That structure makes revision faster than a single yes-or-no answer and mirrors how editorial teams review launch copy. Sharper review prompts follow How to Write AI Prompts That Actually Work.
Request cautious alternatives that preserve the useful point while removing overstated numbers, universal language, or unnamed sources. You remain responsible for what ships. Before publishing, align final copy with the Press Release Generator or Headline Generator if needed.
Step 01
Include the exact wording under review plus quotes, links, data tables, or notes you want treated as evidence.
Step 02
Ask for structured output so weak lines are easy to fix instead of buried in prose.
Step 03
Ship only claims you can defend, keep the review attached, and continue editing in Studio.
Supply sources so this fact checker reviews claims against what you actually know.
Keep drafts, sources, and accepted rewrites organized while you refine the same piece.
Ask separately for softer numbers, clearer qualifiers, or removal of unsupported lines.
Generate cautious and neutral rewrite options before you choose what to publish.
Move verified copy into a release draft with the Press Release Generator.
Carry the reviewed draft into Studio with evidence notes still attached.
It helps you review a claim or draft against the sources you provide, then sort supported facts, weak evidence, missing context, and safer rewrite options. It is a review aid, not a guarantee of truth.
No. Those sites evaluate public claims against published reporting. This page helps you review your own draft copy against the evidence you supply in the prompt.
Treat this page as working from the claim and evidence you supply in the prompt. If you need live source checks, add those findings to the prompt before you ask for a review.
Often the useful answer is more nuanced: supported, unclear, or unsupported with reasons. Ask for structured output instead of a single verdict when the claim depends on context.
No. It helps you spot risky claims faster, but final responsibility for published statements remains with you and your review process.
Apply the cautious rewrite, then continue with the Press Release Generator, Headline Generator, or AI Email Generator as needed.
Paste the claim and your sources. Use this fact checker to separate supported facts from weak lines, revise carefully, and keep the review connected in Ottermind.
Fact-check a claim
