Write, debug, and tune Playwright specs with locator strategy, trace diagnosis, and CI-aware timeouts.
Coding
Trade Validation
Try it10-dimension weighted scoring framework for prediction market trade evaluation. Enforces disciplined position sizing, circuit breakers, and mandatory counter-arguments. Use when: evaluating prediction market trades, scoring opportunities, deciding position sizes, comparing Polymarket/Kalshi opportunities, running pre-trade checklists. Don't use when: general crypto analysis, DeFi yield farming, non-prediction-market investments, stock/equity analysis, sports betting (different framework needed). Negative examples: - "Should I buy ETH?" → No. This is for prediction markets with binary/discrete outcomes. - "What's the best DeFi yield?" → No. Wrong domain entirely. - "Score this sports bet" → No. Sports betting has different dimensions (injuries, matchups). Edge cases: - Crypto prediction markets (e.g., "Will BTC hit $X?") → YES, use this if on Polymarket/Kalshi. - Multi-outcome markets → Score each outcome separately. - Markets with <$25 liquidity → Auto-fail on Liquidity dimension.
What it does
Trade Validation — 10-Dimension Scoring Framework
The skill document
Trade Validation — 10-Dimension Scoring Framework
Rule: NO trade executes without 80%+ weighted confidence score. Any single dimension below 4/10 = AUTOMATIC VETO.
Scoring Dimensions
| # | Dimension | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Information Edge | 18% | Do we know something the market doesn't? |
| 2 | Source Quality | 12% | How reliable are our sources? |
| 3 | Market Efficiency | 10% | Is this market likely mispriced? |
| 4 | Time Horizon | 8% | How long is capital locked up? |
| 5 | Downside Protection | 15% | What's the worst case? |
| 6 | Cross-Validation | 12% | Do multiple independent signals agree? |
| 7 | Historical Accuracy | 5% | Track record on similar bets? |
| 8 | Liquidity/Execution Risk | 7% | Can we get in AND out? |
| 9 | Consensus Divergence | 8% | How far are we from market consensus? |
| 10 | Event Catalyst | 5% | Is there a known resolution trigger? |
Total: 100%
Calculation
Weighted Score = Σ(dimension_score / 10 × weight) × 100
Threshold Rules
| Weighted Score | Action | Bet Size |
|---|---|---|
| < 80% | ❌ NO TRADE | $0 |
| 80–84% | ✅ Minimum | $3–5 |
| 85–89% | ✅ Standard | $5–7 |
| 90%+ | ✅ Conviction | Up to $7.50 (max 10% bankroll) |
Veto Rules
- Any dimension < 4/10 → AUTOMATIC VETO regardless of total score
- Rationale: A critical weakness in any area (e.g., Liquidity = 2 means you're trapped)
Risk Management
- Max position: 10% of portfolio per trade
- Min market liquidity: $25 (below this, don't trade)
- Max open exposure: 30% of bankroll across all positions
- Daily loss circuit breaker: $8 loss in a day → ALL trading stops for 24 hours
- Cool-down: No trade within 1 hour of a loss
- No revenge trading: Last loss must be >24h ago OR new trade is unrelated
- No trading 12am–7am unless time-critical
Mandatory Counter-Arguments
Every trade MUST document:
- Why could we be WRONG? (not a strawman — a genuine strong counter-argument)
- What would change our mind? (specific falsification criteria)
- Exit strategy: When do we sell early?
Score Card Template
TRADE SCORE CARD
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Market: [name]
Date: [date]
Position: [YES/NO @ price]
# Dimension Weight Score Weighted
─── ────────────────────── ──────── ─────── ──────────
1 Information Edge 18% __/10 __._%
2 Source Quality 12% __/10 __._%
3 Market Efficiency 10% __/10 __._%
4 Time Horizon 8% __/10 __._%
5 Downside Protection 15% __/10 __._%
6 Cross-Validation 12% __/10 __._%
7 Historical Accuracy 5% __/10 __._%
8 Liquidity/Execution 7% __/10 __._%
9 Consensus Divergence 8% __/10 __._%
10 Event Catalyst 5% __/10 __._%
─── ────────────────────── ──────── ─────── ──────────
TOTAL 100% __._%
Minimum Score: __/10 (dimension: _____________)
VETO Check: [ ] All dimensions ≥ 4 — PASS / FAIL
Counter-argument: ________________________________
What would change our mind: _____________________
Exit strategy: __________________________________
RESULT: TRADE / NO TRADE
Tier: [ ] Min ($3-5) [ ] Standard ($5-7) [ ] Conviction ($7.50)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Pre-Trade Checklist
RESEARCH
[ ] Minimum 3 independent sources consulted
[ ] Sources documented with links
[ ] Strong counter-argument documented
[ ] Counter-argument is genuine (not strawman)
SCORING
[ ] All 10 dimensions scored
[ ] Weighted score ≥ 80%
[ ] No dimension below 4/10
[ ] Score logged to trade journal
RISK
[ ] Current bankroll: $______
[ ] Bet ≤ 10% of bankroll
[ ] Total open exposure ≤ 30%
[ ] Daily loss < $8 (circuit breaker not triggered)
DISCIPLINE
[ ] Cool-down respected (1h since last loss)
[ ] Not revenge trading
[ ] Not trading 12am–7am
Detailed Scoring Rubric
See references/scoring-rubric.md for the full 1–10 rubric for each dimension.
Trade Journal
Log every scored trade (pass or fail) to projects/polymarket/trade-journal/:
## [DATE] — [MARKET NAME]
- **Score:** XX.X%
- **Result:** TRADE / NO TRADE / VETO
- **Position:** YES/NO @ XXc | **Stake:** $X.XX
- **Outcome:** WIN / LOSS / PENDING
- **P&L:** +/- $X.XX
- **Lesson:** (post-resolution)
Related skills
More from staybased
Browse all skillsCreate targeted, personalized multi-touch cold outreach messages using proven frameworks to engage prospects and boost response rates for B2B and local servi...
Systematically find and evaluate Upwork automation jobs, bid strategically using 2,000+ n8n templates to maximize win rate and delivery speed.
Apply cognitive biases and strategic principles to design pricing that maximizes conversions, optimizes tier structures, and leverages pricing perception.
Design and implement strategies to reduce client churn, increase recurring revenue, and maximize lifetime value through onboarding, value delivery, check-ins...
Build, customize, and deliver n8n workflows fast using a 2,061-template library for triggers, actions, error handling, and multi-step automation.
Write proposals that confirm verbal agreements using the SCR framework to clearly outline problems, solutions, ROI, pricing, timeline, and next steps.