Stores durable facts in a categorized, plain-markdown vault on disk, alongside your agent's built-in memory.
Memory
Ontology 知识图谱
Try itTyped knowledge graph for structured agent memory and composable skills. Create/query/link entities (Person, Project, Task, Event, Document), enforce constra...
What it does
A typed vocabulary + constraint system for representing knowledge as a verifiable graph. Supports entity CRUD, schema validation, automatic sync from memory files, and serves as a backup memory fallback.
The skill document
Ontology 知识图谱
A typed vocabulary + constraint system for representing knowledge as a verifiable graph. Supports entity CRUD, schema validation, automatic sync from memory files, and serves as a backup memory fallback.
Core Concept
Everything is an entity with a type, properties, and relations to other entities. Every mutation is validated against type constraints before committing.
Entity: { id, type, properties, relations, created, updated }
Relation: { from_id, relation_type, to_id, properties }
When to Use
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| "Remember that..." | Create/update entity |
| "What do I know about X?" | Query graph |
| "Link X to Y" | Create relation |
| "Show all tasks for project Z" | Graph traversal |
| "What depends on X?" | Dependency query |
| Planning multi-step work | Model as graph transformations |
| Skill needs shared state | Read/write ontology objects |
| Main memory extraction fails | Backup memory fallback |
Core Types
# Agents & People
Person: { name, email?, phone?, notes?, organization? }
Organization: { name, type?, members[] }
# Work
Project: { name, status, goals[], owner? }
Task: { title, status, due?, priority?, assignee?, blockers[] }
Goal: { description, target_date?, metrics[] }
# Time & Place
Event: { title, start, end?, location?, attendees[], recurrence? }
Location: { name, address?, coordinates? }
# Information
Document: { title, path?, url?, summary? }
Message: { content, sender, recipients[], thread? }
Thread: { subject, participants[], messages[] }
Note: { content, tags[], refs[] }
# Resources
Account: { service, username, credential_ref? }
Device: { name, type, identifiers[] }
Credential: { service, secret_ref } # Never store secrets directly
# Meta
Action: { type, target, timestamp, outcome? }
Policy: { scope, rule, enforcement }
# Extended types (v2.0+)
Technology: { name, domain?, source? }
Skill: { name, source?, version? }
Storage
Default: memory/ontology/graph.jsonl
{"op":"create","entity":{"id":"p_001","type":"Person","properties":{"name":"Alice"}}}
{"op":"create","entity":{"id":"proj_001","type":"Project","properties":{"name":"Website Redesign","status":"active"}}}
{"op":"relate","from":"proj_001","rel":"has_owner","to":"p_001"}
Query via scripts or direct file ops. For complex graphs, migrate to SQLite.
Append-Only Rule
When working with existing ontology data or schema, append/merge changes instead of overwriting files. This preserves history and avoids clobbering prior definitions.
Workflows
Create Entity
python scripts/ontology.py create --type Person --props '{"name":"Alice","email":"alice@example.com"}'
Query
python scripts/ontology.py query --type Task --where '{"status":"open"}'
python scripts/ontology.py get --id task_001
python scripts/ontology.py related --id proj_001 --rel has_task
python scripts/ontology.py list --type Person
Link Entities
python scripts/ontology.py relate --from proj_001 --rel has_task --to task_001
Validate
python scripts/ontology.py validate # Check all constraints
Auto-Sync from Memory Files (v2.0+)
# Sync entities from daily notes (last 7 days)
python scripts/ontology_sync.py
# Sync last N days
python scripts/ontology_sync.py --days 3
# Dry run (preview only)
python scripts/ontology_sync.py --dry-run
# Check graph status
python scripts/ontology_sync.py --status
Backup Memory Fallback (v2.0+)
When the primary memory system fails to extract accurate results, Ontology serves as a backup memory layer:
Fallback hierarchy:
tdai_memory_search(primary memory)openclaw-mem0(auxiliary memory)- Ontology graph (structured entities + relations)
Trigger conditions: Primary memory returns empty results / inaccurate data / user says "results are wrong"
Query examples:
# List all projects
python scripts/ontology.py list --type Project
# Query by type and property
python scripts/ontology.py query --type Organization --where '{"type":"supplier"}'
# Get related entities for a person
python scripts/ontology.py related --id pers_xxx --dir both
Constraints
Define in memory/ontology/schema.yaml:
types:
Task:
required: [title, status]
status_enum: [open, in_progress, blocked, done]
Event:
required: [title, start]
validate: "end >= start if end exists"
Credential:
required: [service, secret_ref]
forbidden_properties: [password, secret, token] # Force indirection
relations:
has_owner:
from_types: [Project, Task]
to_types: [Person]
cardinality: many_to_one
blocks:
from_types: [Task]
to_types: [Task]
acyclic: true # No circular dependencies
Skill Contract
Skills that use ontology should declare:
# In SKILL.md frontmatter or header
ontology:
reads: [Task, Project, Person]
writes: [Task, Action]
preconditions:
- "Task.assignee must exist"
postconditions:
- "Created Task has status=open"
Planning as Graph Transformation
Model multi-step plans as a sequence of graph operations:
Plan: "Schedule team meeting and create follow-up tasks"
1. CREATE Event { title: "Team Sync", attendees: [p_001, p_002] }
2. RELATE Event -> has_project -> proj_001
3. CREATE Task { title: "Prepare agenda", assignee: p_001 }
4. RELATE Task -> for_event -> event_001
5. CREATE Task { title: "Send summary", assignee: p_001, blockers: [task_001] }
Each step is validated before execution. Rollback on constraint violation.
Integration Patterns
With Causal Inference
Log ontology mutations as causal actions:
# When creating/updating entities, also log to causal action log
action = {
"action": "create_entity",
"domain": "ontology",
"context": {"type": "Task", "project": "proj_001"},
"outcome": "created"
}
Cross-Skill Communication
# Email skill creates commitment
commitment = ontology.create("Commitment", {
"source_message": msg_id,
"description": "Send report by Friday",
"due": "2026-01-31"
})
# Task skill picks it up
tasks = ontology.query("Commitment", {"status": "pending"})
for c in tasks:
ontology.create("Task", {
"title": c.description,
"due": c.due,
"source": c.id
})
Cron Auto-Sync Setup
Recommended: Configure an OpenClaw Cron job for daily auto-sync:
{
"name": "Ontology Daily Sync",
"schedule": { "kind": "cron", "expr": "0 22 * * *", "tz": "Asia/Shanghai" },
"payload": {
"kind": "agentTurn",
"message": "Run ontology sync: python scripts/ontology_sync.py --days 7"
},
"sessionTarget": "isolated"
}
Quick Start
# Initialize ontology storage
mkdir -p memory/ontology
touch memory/ontology/graph.jsonl
# Create schema (optional but recommended)
python scripts/ontology.py schema-append --data '{
"types": {
"Task": { "required": ["title", "status"] },
"Project": { "required": ["name"] },
"Person": { "required": ["name"] }
}
}'
# Start using
python scripts/ontology.py create --type Person --props '{"name":"Alice"}'
python scripts/ontology.py list --type Person
# Auto-sync from existing memory files
python scripts/ontology_sync.py --days 30
References
references/schema.md— Full type definitions and constraint patternsreferences/queries.md— Query language and traversal examples
File Structure
ontology/
├── SKILL.md # This file
├── scripts/
│ ├── ontology.py # Core CLI (create/query/relate/validate)
│ └── ontology_sync.py # Auto-sync from memory files (v2.0+)
└── references/
├── schema.md # Schema reference
└── queries.md # Query patterns
Instruction Scope
Runtime instructions operate on local files (memory/ontology/graph.jsonl and memory/ontology/schema.yaml) and provide CLI usage for create/query/relate/validate; this is within scope. The skill reads/writes workspace files and will create the memory/ontology directory when used. Validation includes property/enum/forbidden checks, relation type/cardinality validation, acyclicity for relations marked acyclic: true, and Event end >= start checks; other higher-level constraints may still be documentation-only unless implemented in code.
Related skills
Generate and edit Draw.io, Mermaid, and Excalidraw diagrams from natural language using a structured JSON spec.
Find why your productivity system keeps failing, then apply the smallest fix — capacity math, bottleneck routing, durable local notes.
Join a video meeting as an AI bot with voice, avatar, and screenshare across four operating modes.
Fetch raw ad creative, app, ranking, and revenue data from AdMapix as structured JSON.
Site audit, content writing, and competitor analysis for organic search rankings.
More from paudyyin
Browse all skills长链任务执行skill — 被skill-router调用,负责复杂任务的调度、spawn子代理、Hat系统编排和收尾检查
沪深300多因子投研系统 v6.0 — 多策略量化选股平台。每当用户要求分析A股、沪深300、 多因子选股、投研日报、股票评分、个股基本面/技术面分析时,必须使用此技能。 新增9大策略体系:宽基指增(沪深300/500/1000)、主动量化(多策略复合/空气指增/成长期优选)、 高频量价(16因子月频/周频)、特...
Measure bottlenecks then optimize for performance
为幻灯片、文档、报告、HTML页面等应用专业主题配色和字体。 内置10套精选主题,也可以按需生成自定义主题。当用户说"换个配色"、 "美化这个文档"、"选个专业的字体"、"生成一套主题"时使用。
Connect to the EvoMap AI agent marketplace. Publish Gene+Capsule bundles, fetch promoted assets, earn credits via bounty tasks, register as a worker, self-pr...
Threat-model and harden applications against security vulnerabilities