Chrome Extension Maintainer

Chrome Extension Maintainer

Goal

Operate on Chrome extensions as small regulated products: a browser runtime, a permissions contract, a privacy promise, a public listing, a support surface, and a release history.

This skill is an operating workflow and review rubric. It does not bundle a Playwright harness, Chrome Web Store uploader, analytics connector, or package builder. Use repo-local scripts and installed tools when they exist, and report any missing tool as a release-evidence gap rather than inventing proof.

When To Use

• A Chrome extension needs release readiness review, packaging, or a publish/no-publish decision.
• Store analytics, Search Console, GA, reviews, or support messages suggest weak growth or high uninstall risk.
• Manifest permissions, MV3 service-worker behavior, content scripts, host access, CSP, or privacy claims need review.
• Public surfaces need alignment: Chrome Web Store listing, landing page, support page, privacy page, screenshots, sitemap, or llms.txt.
• A Codex or ClawHub skill companion for Chrome extension maintenance needs validation before publication.

Operating Order

1. Identify the target extension, release channel, and irreversible action.
   • Separate local Codex install, ClawHub registry publish, GitHub release, Chrome Web Store upload, submit, unpublish, rollback, and public promotion.
   • Do not perform any external upload, submit, registry publish, unpublish, rollback, deletion, or broad public promotion without explicit user approval.
2. Read the extension manifest, package scripts, listing copy, privacy/support pages, landing pages, and previous review artifacts.
3. If policy, Chrome versions, competitor claims, store requirements, or search behavior matter, verify current sources before deciding.
4. Document data flow:
   • browser-visible input
   • local extension storage
   • background/service-worker behavior
   • backend calls
   • third-party APIs or models
   • retention and deletion path
5. Check permissions:
   • prefer activeTab plus click-triggered scripting
   • justify every API and host permission
   • flag new warning surfaces before publish
6. Run the local gates that exist in the repo:
   • manifest/package validation
   • unit tests
   • Playwright/Puppeteer E2E with the unpacked extension
   • service-worker termination/restart tests when relevant
   • localization key/placeholder checks
   • accessibility and responsive layout checks
   • leak/secret scans when publishing public code or skills
7. Use real-user reviewer personas for at least the primary flow:
   • first-time user
   • privacy reviewer
   • Chrome Web Store reviewer
   • power user
   • localization reviewer
   • portfolio reviewer
8. Align public surfaces:
   • CWS title, summary, description, screenshots, privacy declarations, support URL, and reviewer notes
   • landing page, support page, privacy page, sitemap, robots, and llms.txt if present
   • Codex/ClawHub skill metadata when shipping a skill companion
9. Package and inspect the exact artifact intended for release.
10. Produce a green/yellow/red ship recommendation.

Required Reference

Read references/chrome-extension-maintenance-playbook.md when the task involves release readiness, growth diagnosis, public listing/landing work, privacy claims, permissions, MV3 service workers, i18n, packaging, browser E2E evidence, or portfolio decisions.

Validation Commands

Use the project’s own commands first. If the repo has no equivalent command, say that the evidence is missing.

For Chrome extension repos, typical gates are:

npm run check
npm test
npm run check:cws
npm run check:extension-locales
npm run e2e
npm run package

For Codex/ClawHub skill packages, use commands like:

python3 ~/.codex/skills/.system/skill-creator/scripts/quick_validate.py 
clawhub whoami --no-input
clawhub inspect  --no-input
find  -maxdepth 3 -type f -print | sort

Before publishing a skill package, confirm:

• SKILL.md is valid and has concrete workflow, rules, and validation guidance.
• agents/openai.yaml matches the skill’s actual scope.
• .clawhubignore excludes generated local state such as .clawpatch/, .git/, .codex-run/, node_modules/, dist/, logs, and cache files.
• no generated review state, local absolute paths, secrets, or private artifacts are in the package.
• ClawPatch or an equivalent review has either zero findings or documented non-applicability.

Green/Yellow/Red

Green:

• primary browser flow works in real E2E evidence
• privacy and permission story matches code and public copy
• package/version identity is clear
• no untriaged P0/P1 findings remain

Yellow:

• usable for quiet test, beta, or local publication
• evidence or copy still has gaps
• do not broadly promote

Red:

• primary flow broken
• promise mismatch
• privacy ambiguity
• missing real browser evidence
• unresolved release blocker

Review Output

Lead with critical findings. Then report:

• tests and commands run
• user flows verified
• files changed
• release artifacts created
• remaining blockers
• rollback or recovery path
• final green/yellow/red decision

Rules

• Prefer fixes that reduce permission, privacy, and support risk.
• Treat installs as weak evidence; prioritize retained weekly users, uninstall ratio, conversion, support themes, and actual repeated use.
• Do not let listing or landing copy claim official affiliation, background crawling, unlimited use, hidden safety, or broad privacy promises unless the implementation proves it.
• For i18n, require default_locale, complete locale keys, placeholder parity, and RTL smoke coverage when /_locales exists.
• For MV3, assume service workers can terminate and require durable state for long work.
• For public skill publication, validate SKILL.md, agents/openai.yaml, references/scripts, leak risk, and registry auth before publishing.