Coding

project-ops-protocol

Try it

A lightweight operating protocol for running serious projects across multiple AI sessions/agents and humans: layered battle map, three ledgers of record, an append-only alignment board with milestone heartbeats, a relay note for cross-session handover, plus quality-judge gates before any external publish. Triggers: start a new project, multi-session collaboration, project ops, mechanism/handbook, alignment, wrap-up, retrospective, operating model.

What it does

A lightweight operating protocol for running serious projects across multiple AI sessions/agents and humans: layered battle map, three ledgers of record, an append-only alignment board with milestone heartbeats, a relay note for cross-session handover, plus quality-judge gates before any external publish. Triggers: start a new project, multi-session collaboration, project ops, mechanism/handbook, alignment, wrap-up, retrospective, operating model.

The skill document

lgd-powered-en

Project Ops Protocol (POP)

Proven on a long-running multi-session project: 100+ docs, 50+ tools, several parallel AI sessions and one human decision-maker — without losing state, duplicating work, or colliding. Everything below is copy-paste-able into any new project. It is a method, not a company secret.

When to use

  • You are starting a real project that will span many sessions/agents/days.
  • Several AI sessions (or people) work the same project in parallel.
  • Someone asks "how do we organize / what's the mechanism / do a retrospective".
  • Skip it for one-off questions and single-tool jobs.

Core idea: four layers

Plan     layered battle map: Stand → Build → Distribute; each layer closes
         before the next opens; an honest "watchlist" for what we deliberately
         do NOT do now (with a review cadence).
Execute  measure first, reuse before build, converge over duplicate;
         statuses change only after they actually happen.
Sync     one append-only alignment board + milestone heartbeats + @channel tags.
Memory   one relay note (read first by any new session) + a living handbook
         where process changes land BEFORE they are announced.

Standard artifacts (build once, reuse always)

ArtifactJobWrite rule
Battle maplayers, milestones, watchlistclose a layer before opening the next
Release ledgerchannel/publish status = source of truthchange only on real events; URLs clickable
Domain/topic ledgerstable IDs per deliverablecreate once, never renumber
Alignment boardcross-session heartbeatappend-only; one line per completed deliverable
Relay notecross-session memoryupdate at every wrap-up
Retrospectivefacts + mechanism + traps + take-awaysmandatory at project close
Handbookrules live herechange the handbook FIRST, then announce

Hard rules (the cards that prevent the common failure modes)

  1. Heartbeat: within 5 minutes of finishing a deliverable, +1 line on the alignment board (time | line | did what | path/url). No polling loops; to request something from another line, tag it on the board.
  2. No-collision: before starting work, read the division of labour + the tail of the alignment board. Reuse before rebuild: scan existing assets first.
  3. Unique anchors: when editing shared files, match on a unique string and re-check neighbouring lines after saving (prevents silent overwrites).
  4. Measure first: plan conclusions come from actual inventory (counts/APIs), never from vibes.
  5. Honest watchlist: what we are NOT doing goes on the watchlist with a review date — it never becomes a zombie todo.
  6. Secrets: a local encrypted credential store only; secrets never in chat, commands, screenshots, or shared plaintext folders. Inject into processes via environment, echo nothing.
  7. Gate before external publish: desensitize scan → quality judge (5 dims, ≥0.80 pass, any 0.0 vetoes) → safe packaging → owner approval.
  8. Process changes land in the handbook before being announced anywhere else.

Quality judge (LLM-as-judge rubric)

Score each deliverable 0.0–1.0 per dimension; pass ≥0.80; any 0.0 = veto:

  1. Factual accuracy — every claim traces to a source?
  2. Citation accuracy — sources actually support the claims?
  3. Completeness — conclusions, boundaries, attribution, license all present?
  4. Source quality — primary/official preferred over secondary retells?
  5. Discipline — no internal names, secrets, local paths, or private strategy words in anything going outside? Quick 30-second self-check: (a) can each claim be pointed to a source? (b) am I citing the primary source, not a retell? (c) would this leak anything internal if it went public?

New-project checklist (day 1)

  • battle map v0.1 (layers + milestones + watchlist)
  • three ledgers identified/created
  • alignment board created + heartbeat rule announced (multi-session only)
  • existing assets scanned (no rebuilding what exists)
  • roles/boundaries written down where everyone can see

Wrap-up checklist (project or big day ends)

  • layer close-out checked, including watchlist explanation
  • retrospective written (data / mechanism / traps / take-aways)
  • relay note updated (single place every new session reads first)
  • open items listed explicitly (≠ failure — honesty is the standard)

Boundaries & philosophy

  • Markdown + filesystem is enough until retrieval actually degrades; do not front-load vector DBs / knowledge graphs / event buses (benchmarks show plain files beat specialised memory tools when retrieval is reliable).
  • Handbook-first (borrowed from GitLab), orchestrator-worker + compressed reports back (borrowed from Anthropic multi-agent research), judge-gated publishing. All ideas are credited to their sources — copy what works.

© 2026 Zhao Xinghua (Steven Zhao) — CC BY 4.0 · MedXpert × SynomosAI

Related skills

Manage AI-agent work as an execution graph instead of a flat TODO list. Use TaskOps to structure objectives, task decomposition, run readiness, execution log...

21 installs

AI-native one-person company operating system with 7 autonomous agent departments, governance, cron automation, revenue funnel, and inter-agent comms.

1 installs

文件太多?AI忘上文?换会话麻烦?AI记错版本? 请给 AI 长期项目建立「项目记忆 + 文件索引 + 工作规则 + 版本记录」的治理系统。让 AI 换会话、换模型、甚至换 Agent 后,仍然能完美交接项目,而无需重新遍历或猜测。 包含:跨 Agent 的公共协议:VERSIONS.md / LESSONS.md / whitelist.json / blacklist.json / index.md ;适配器:SKILL.md / CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / .cursor/rules/ 。 适配TRAE,其他代理无法保证。 CLI 已通过 76 用例健壮性测试。

1 installs

Drive an Operately workspace from the command line — goals, projects, tasks, people, and documents via a single CLI.

22 installs

Use when the user asks Codex to follow up, analyze, investigate, or is @mentioned for a project/system maintenance or operations issue. Guides Codex to clari...

10 installs1 stars

🇺🇸 Your dev team ships features nobody asked for while user-reported bugs pile up for months. Operations blames engineering for ignoring users; engineering...