Connect MCP with human-approved OAuth
Security
PlanWright Control Plane
Try itThe control plane for autonomous software labor. Humans declare objectives; coding agents claim and execute them over MCP; every action lands in a signed, hash-chained audit trail. Use it when parallel coding agents need coordination and an auditable record of what changed.
What it does
Use when the user is running one or more coding agents and needs a shared control plane to coordinate work and keep an audit trail. Triggers include running parallel Claude Code/Cursor sessions, agents colliding on the same work, needing objectives instead of a task list, or needing auditable evidence of agent-authored changes.
The skill document
PlanWright control plane
PlanWright coordinates autonomous coding work over MCP. Humans declare objectives (desired state); agents claim and execute them; every action is written to a signed, hash-chained audit ledger.
When to use
- More than one agent session is running and they risk colliding.
- The user wants coarse objectives, not story points or subtasks.
- The user needs auditable evidence of what an agent did and who approved it.
- The user mentions "Planwright", "objectives", "control plane", or "audit trail".
How to work with it (via the planwright MCP tools)
-
Anchor to the repo first with an explicit project ID (slug lookups fail until anchored). This is the #1 gotcha. Use
planwright_set_repowith the repo name (e.g.,owner/repo) or project ID. -
Read open objectives using
planwright_list_objectivesto see what's available in each lane (backlog, scheduled, in_progress, acceptance, done). -
Claim one using
planwright_claim_objective— claiming locks it so parallel agents skip it. Only claim objectives in thescheduledlane. -
Decompose and plan — break down the objective into steps, then post your plan using
planwright_append_plan. -
Execute — implement the changes in the codebase.
-
Check in — record your work:
- Use
planwright_record_diffto log commits/diffs - Use
planwright_submit_test_runto record test results - Use
planwright_append_notefor progress updates
- Use
-
Request acceptance — when done, call
planwright_request_acceptanceto move the objective to the acceptance lane for human review. -
Take the next objective — repeat from step 2.
Common gotchas
- Must call
planwright_set_repofirst — all other tools fail without an anchored project. - Bugs go in the bug lane, not the planning surface — use the bug tools, not objective tools.
- The audit ledger records every change automatically — surface the relevant entry when the user asks "who/what/when".
Tool categories
Session & context: planwright_set_repo, planwright_list_workspaces, planwright_list_projects, planwright_get_board_url
Objectives: planwright_list_objectives, planwright_get_objective, planwright_create_objective, planwright_update_objective, planwright_schedule_objective, planwright_claim_objective, planwright_check_alignment
Agent workflow: planwright_append_plan, planwright_record_diff, planwright_submit_test_run, planwright_request_acceptance, planwright_append_note
Initiatives: planwright_list_initiatives, planwright_create_initiative, planwright_update_initiative, planwright_delete_initiative
Bugs: planwright_list_my_bugs
Context files: planwright_list_context_files, planwright_get_context_file, planwright_push_context_file
Example conversation
User: "I have three Claude Code sessions working on different features. How do I make sure they don't step on each other?"
Agent: I'll set up PlanWright as your control plane. First, let me anchor to your repo and see the current objectives.
[Calls planwright_set_repo with the repo name] [Calls planwright_list_objectives to show available work]
Each session should claim a different objective from the scheduled lane. Claiming locks it, so other agents will skip it and move to the next available objective. When an agent finishes, it requests acceptance and takes another.
Related skills
Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via acpx (ACP protocol). Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (s...
Use when designing, writing, building, diagnosing, or revising NodeCoda Source through the authenticated NodeCoda MCP service.
Run a Byzantine 2+1 plan before consequential work and a fresh, plan-blind reality check afterward. Use when the user asks for Plus Ultra, maximum rigor, independent proposals, enforced verification, or help responding to a Plus Ultra hook gate. Claude Code can enforce the loop through the included hook adapter; on Codex and other hosts it is a convention unless separately wired and verified.
Runtime safety guard for OpenClaw multi-agent workflows. Blocks destructive tools (write, edit, exec, process, apply_patch) for controlled agents, forcing de...
Govern and actively monitor collaborative agent work