Help users with Validated demand: Founders, analysts, and operators need help reviewing financial models, checking assumptions, building revenue or expense f...
Data & analysis
Earnings Quality Reviewer
Try itReviews earnings quality before valuation when structured financial statements are available; optional notes improve confidence. Requires supplied data only...
What it does
Reviews earnings quality before valuation when structured financial statements are available; optional notes improve confidence. Requires supplied data only...
The skill document
Earnings Quality Reviewer
Purpose
Assess whether reported earnings are reliable enough to support valuation conviction.
Scope
- Income statement.
- Balance sheet.
- Cash flow statement.
- Profitability, liquidity, leverage, and efficiency ratios.
- Financial statement notes.
- One-offs and non-recurring items.
- Related-party notes.
- Debt maturity notes.
Non-goals
- No data fetching.
- No fabrication of missing notes.
- No absolute buy/sell instructions.
Input contract
Provide structured financials and optional notes:
- Income statement line items, including revenue, gross profit, operating profit, finance cost, tax, net income, and non-recurring items when available.
- Balance sheet line items, including cash, receivables, inventory, current assets, debt, payables, current liabilities, equity, and total assets.
- Cash flow line items, including cash flow from operations, capital expenditure, free cash flow, financing cash flows, and material working-capital movements.
- Ratios or enough raw fields to compute ratios.
- Optional notes covering accounting policy changes, related-party transactions, debt maturities, contingencies, and management adjustments.
Data quality gate
Before reviewing earnings quality, assess:
- Statement freshness: whether statement dates are current enough for the valuation date.
- Missing lines: whether key income statement, balance sheet, or cash flow lines are absent.
- Cash-flow completeness: whether operating cash flow, capital expenditure, and free cash flow are available or can be derived.
- Notes availability: whether notes are supplied for accounting policies, one-offs, related parties, contingencies, and debt maturities.
If the data gate fails, still provide a review when possible, but lower confidence and list the gaps in the handoff bundle.
Review checklist
- Cash conversion: compare net income with operating cash flow and free cash flow across the available period.
- Accrual risk: identify large earnings-without-cash patterns, margin expansion without cash support, capitalization concerns, or abnormal non-cash items.
- Working capital pressure: review receivables, inventory, payables, current ratio trends, and cash conversion cycle signals when available.
- Leverage/refinancing risk: assess debt load, short-term maturities, interest burden, covenant or liquidity pressure, and refinancing dependence.
- One-off adjustments: separate recurring earnings power from asset sales, impairments, restructuring charges, tax effects, FX effects, and other non-recurring items.
- Governance/accounting red flags: flag related-party transactions, accounting policy changes, auditor concerns, restatements, unusually aggressive assumptions, and unexplained note gaps.
Required output format
Use exactly these sections:
Input QualityEarnings Quality ScoreCash Conversion and AccrualsBalance Sheet and Working CapitalOne-Offs and Accounting Red FlagsValuation Confidence ImpactHandoff Bundle
Shared confidence rubric
High: fresh statements, complete income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow data, notes available, consistent cash conversion, limited accrual concerns, and no material unresolved red flags.Medium: usable statements and cash-flow data, but notes are incomplete, one major line group is limited, or there are moderate unresolved earnings-quality concerns.Low: stale statements, missing cash-flow data, missing notes, major unexplained accruals, significant working-capital stress, refinancing risk, or material accounting/governance red flags.
Guardrails
- Separate facts, assumptions, and inference.
- Do not fabricate missing line items, notes, explanations, or management intent.
- Cap confidence at
Mediumwhen relevant notes are missing. - Treat red flags as valuation-risk inputs, not trading commands.
- Use cautious language when the evidence is incomplete or mixed.
Handoff bundle
Include these exact markers:
tickeras_of_dateearnings_quality_tiercash_conversionaccrual_riskworking_capital_pressureleverage_refinancing_riskone_off_adjustmentsred_flagsvaluation_confidence_impactdata_gaps
Trigger examples
- "Review earnings quality before I run valuation."
- "Check whether these reported profits are cash-backed."
- "Assess accrual risk and working-capital pressure from these statements."
- "Prepare an earnings-quality handoff for the valuation model."
Related skills
Earnings analysis for US stocks, organized the way a quarter actually reads: the per-quarter analysis report of what a company reported, with the editorial headline, marquee KPI highlights and their year-over-year deltas, the guidance language as management phrased it, and a summary of the earnings call, plus SEC risk-factor diffs attached to the quarter they belong to, the AI takeaway signal, who reported in the last week, and the forward calendar of who reports next. Every claim carries its fiscal period and report date, and absence is stated rather than skipped. Use for "analyze AAPL earnings", "earnings report analysis", "earnings call summary", "who reported earnings this week", "post earnings review", "upcoming earnings preview". Read-only. No trading, no purchases, no write operations, no wallet access.
Turn an official earnings script into one spoken earnings script read per labeled section. This earnings call voice studio writes earnings report narration and quarterly results audio from the prepared remarks the company already wrote, then records 8 to 20 earnings script voice clips. Use it for investor update voice packs that stay one section, one clip.
Evidence-first structured review with source-tiered claims. For code, notes, agent output, and research. Inspired by gstack methodology and gbrain source-tie...
Review the quality, reproducibility, legal reasoning, and decision usefulness of an existing freedom-to-operate (FTO), patent-infringement-risk, or event IP risk report. Use for three-layer evidence review, four-dimension scoring, independent multi-route search comparison, omission analysis, fatal-defect screening, remediation planning, or HTML assessment generation. The skill audits a supplied report; it does not replace a jurisdiction-specific legal opinion.
Normalized company financial statements and computed ratios from SEC EDGAR via Edgrapi.com. Pull clean income/balance/cash-flow figures and margin/return/lev...