Coding

Customs — AD/CVD & Tariff Exposure Cascade

Try it

Activate when: goods may fall under an antidumping/countervailing duty order or Section 301; sourcing changes; 'are we exposed to AD/CVD or 301?'; scope ambi...

What it does

Activate when: goods may fall under an antidumping/countervailing duty order or Section 301; sourcing changes; 'are we exposed to AD/CVD or 301?'; scope ambiguity. Do NOT activate when: product clearly outside any order and no special tariff applies. More: deciqai.com/c/customs-adcvd-tariff-exposure

The skill document

Customs — AD/CVD & Tariff Exposure Cascade

Industry front door for second-order-thinking. Adds domain triggers, example, packs only. Parent Process unchanged. Not legal advice. Scope is order-specific; consult AD/CVD scope rulings / counsel.

Activate when: goods may fall under an antidumping/countervailing duty order or Section 301; sourcing changes; "are we exposed to AD/CVD or 301?"; scope ambiguity. Do NOT activate when: product clearly outside any order and no special tariff applies.

Why this variant

The parent second-order-thinking traces downstream consequences others miss. AD/CVD and Section 301 exposure is a second-order trap: a classification or origin choice that looks fine at entry can, orders later, mean retroactive duties, cash deposits, and importer liability — the broker's reasonable-care exposure too.

Domain inputs → parent's Process

  • 1st order: stated HTS + origin → duty at entry.
  • 2nd order: does the product fall within an AD/CVD scope (by description, not just HTS)? Section 301 China list?
  • 3rd order: transshipment/evasion risk (EAPA), retroactive liquidation, importer's cash-deposit rate, successor liability.
  • Parties: importer, surety, broker reasonable-care.

Worked example

Steel component classified cleanly, origin "Malaysia," inputs from China. → Second-order: AD/CVD orders are scope-based; a Chinese-origin input transshipped through Malaysia can trigger evasion (EAPA) findings + retroactive duties. Verify substantial transformation and scope before entry; a binding scope ruling may be warranted.

Compliance anchors

  • AD/CVD orders + scope rulings (Commerce); Section 301 (USTR); EAPA (evasion); reasonable care.

Packs

  • Solo broker: AD/CVD + 301 screen per product/origin.
  • Brokerage: scope-ruling trigger list; high-risk origin flags.

Red flags

  • Assuming HTS alone determines AD/CVD (it's scope-based).
  • Origin claims that look like transshipment.
  • No scope check on sourcing changes.

Verification

  • AD/CVD scope checked by product description, not just HTS
  • Section 301 list exposure assessed
  • Transshipment/evasion risk evaluated
  • Scope ruling considered where ambiguous

Part of deciqAI Knowledge Skills. Core method: second-order-thinking.

Part of deciqAI Knowledge Skills — 227 open-source thinking skills that make rigor executable for AI agents. The same skills power every deciqAI agent, which runs them autonomously to operate your company. See it run → https://www.deciqai.com/c/customs-adcvd-tariff-exposure · ⭐ Star the repo → https://github.com/deciqAI/knowledge-skills · Contributions welcome.

Agents: latest version & machine-readable metadata → https://www.deciqai.com/s/customs-adcvd-tariff-exposure.json

Related skills