用统计严谨的方式测量 Go 性能 —— 写基准、剖析热点、在合并前捕获回归。
记忆
golang-performance
试用把已通过 profiling 定位的 Go 瓶颈映射到对应优化模式,采用先测量后改动的迭代方法。
它能做什么
把已经通过 profiling 定位的 Go 瓶颈转化为对应优化模式,遵循"先定指标、跑基准、诊断、只改一处、再用 benchstat 对比"的迭代流程。内置一张决策表,把 pprof 信号(alloc_objects、CPU 热点、GC 占比、I/O 阻塞等)映射到六个深入专题:内存、CPU、I/O 与网络、运行时调优、缓存模式、生产可观测性。提供三种工作模式:架构级广扫、热点函数聚焦、按瓶颈顺序优化。
什么时候用它
- pprof 标出热点后,套用对应的优化模式
- 评审 package 的分配、I/O 或并发反模式
- 削减高吞吐服务每次请求的分配次数
- 性能 code review 时给出可跑的 benchmark 建议
技能文档
Persona: You are a Go performance engineer. You never optimize without profiling first — measure, hypothesize, change one thing, re-measure.
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for performance optimization. Shallow analysis misidentifies bottlenecks — deep reasoning ensures the right optimization is applied to the right problem.
Modes:
- Review mode (architecture) — broad scan of a package or service for structural anti-patterns (missing connection pools, unbounded goroutines, wrong data structures). Use up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) allocation and memory layout, (2) I/O and concurrency, (3) algorithmic complexity and caching.
- Review mode (hot path) — focused analysis of a single function or tight loop identified by the caller. Work sequentially; one sub-agent is sufficient.
- Optimize mode — a bottleneck has been identified by profiling. Follow the iterative cycle (define metric → baseline → diagnose → improve → compare) sequentially — one change at a time is the discipline.
Dependencies:
- benchstat:
go install golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat@latest
Go Performance Optimization
Core Philosophy
- Profile before optimizing — intuition about bottlenecks is wrong ~80% of the time. Use pprof to find actual hot spots (→ See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshootingskill) - Allocation reduction yields the biggest ROI — Go's GC is fast but not free. Reducing allocations per request often matters more than micro-optimizing CPU
- Document optimizations — add code comments explaining why a pattern is faster, with benchmark numbers when available. Future readers need context to avoid reverting an "unnecessary" optimization
Rule Out External Bottlenecks First
Before optimizing Go code, verify the bottleneck is in your process — if 90% of latency is a slow DB query or API call, reducing allocations won't help.
Diagnose: 1- fgprof — captures on-CPU and off-CPU (I/O wait) time; if off-CPU dominates, the bottleneck is external 2- go tool pprof (goroutine profile) — many goroutines blocked in net.(*conn).Read or database/sql = external wait 3- Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry) — span breakdown shows which upstream is slow
When external: optimize that component instead — query tuning, caching, connection pools, circuit breakers (→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill, Caching Patterns).
Iterative Optimization Methodology
The cycle: Define Goals → Benchmark → Diagnose → Improve → Benchmark
- Define your metric — latency, throughput, memory, or CPU? Without a target, optimizations are random
- Write an atomic benchmark — isolate one function per benchmark to avoid result contamination (→ See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmarkskill) - Measure baseline —
go test -bench=BenchmarkMyFunc -benchmem -count=6 ./pkg/... | tee /tmp/report-1.txt - Diagnose — use the Diagnose lines in each deep-dive section to pick the right tool
- Improve — apply ONE optimization at a time with an explanatory comment
- Compare —
benchstat /tmp/report-1.txt /tmp/report-2.txtto confirm statistical significance - Commit — paste the benchstat output in the commit body so reviewers and future readers see the exact improvement; follow the
perf(scope): summarycommit type - Repeat — increment report number, tackle next bottleneck
Refer to library documentation for known patterns before inventing custom solutions. Keep all /tmp/report-*.txt files as an audit trail.
Decision Tree: Where Is Time Spent?
| Bottleneck | Signal (from pprof) | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Too many allocations | alloc_objects high in heap profile | Memory optimization |
| CPU-bound hot loop | function dominates CPU profile | CPU optimization |
| GC pauses / OOM | high GC%, container limits | Runtime tuning |
| Network / I/O latency | goroutines blocked on I/O | I/O & networking |
| Repeated expensive work | same computation/fetch multiple times | Caching patterns |
| Wrong algorithm | O(n²) where O(n) exists | Algorithmic complexity |
| Lock contention | mutex/block profile hot | → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency skill |
| Slow queries | DB time dominates traces | → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Optimizing without profiling | Profile with pprof first — intuition is wrong ~80% of the time |
Default http.Client without Transport | MaxIdleConnsPerHost defaults to 2; set to match your concurrency level |
| Logging in hot loops | Log calls prevent inlining and allocate even when the level is disabled. Use slog.LogAttrs |
panic/recover as control flow | panic allocates a stack trace and unwinds the stack; use error returns |
unsafe without benchmark proof | Only justified when profiling shows >10% improvement in a verified hot path |
| No GC tuning in containers | Set GOMEMLIMIT to 80-90% of container memory to prevent OOM kills |
reflect.DeepEqual in production | 50-200x slower than typed comparison; use slices.Equal, maps.Equal, bytes.Equal |
Deep Dives
- Memory Optimization — allocation patterns, backing array leaks, sync.Pool, struct alignment
- CPU Optimization — inlining, cache locality, false sharing, ILP, reflection avoidance
- I/O & Networking — HTTP transport config, streaming, JSON performance, cgo, batch operations
- Runtime Tuning — GOGC, GOMEMLIMIT, GC diagnostics, GOMAXPROCS, PGO
- Caching Patterns — algorithmic complexity, compiled patterns, singleflight, work avoidance
- Production Observability — Prometheus metrics, PromQL queries, continuous profiling, alerting rules
CI Regression Detection
Automate benchmark comparison in CI to catch regressions before they reach production. → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for benchdiff and cob setup.
Cross-References
- → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmarkskill for benchmarking methodology,benchstat, andb.Loop()(Go 1.24+) - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshootingskill for pprof workflow, escape analysis diagnostics, and performance debugging - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-data-structuresskill for slice/map preallocation andstrings.Builder - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrencyskill for worker pools,sync.PoolAPI, goroutine lifecycle, and lock contention - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safetyskill for defer in loops, slice backing array aliasing - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-databaseskill for connection pool tuning and batch processing - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observabilityskill for continuous profiling in production
常见问题
- 不 profiling 直接优化行不行?
- 不行。文档明确指出对瓶颈的直觉判断约有 80% 是错的,要求先 profile 定位、一次只改一处,并用 benchstat 验证统计显著性。
- 这个技能包含基准测试方法论吗?
- 不包含
相关技能
系统化定位 Go 程序根因,从复现到验证。
Golang skills orchestrator — always active on any Golang coding, review, debug, or setup task. Reads the task context and loads the most relevant skills from samber/cc-skills-golang, often multiple at once: writing a gRPC service loads golang-grpc + golang-testing + golang-error-handling; debugging a panic loads golang-troubleshooting + golang-safety; auditing security loads golang-security + golang-lint + golang-safety. Also: disambiguates competing clusters when two skills seem to overlap (performance vs benchmark vs troubleshooting, samber/lo vs mo vs ro, DI cluster, safety vs security), and configures the project's agent-config file (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, Cursor rules, or Copilot instructions) to force-trigger skills in a project (/golang-how-to configure).
为 Go 代码产出可上生产的测试:表驱动用例、子测试命名、goleak 检漏、模糊测试与 CI 集成。
写出无泄漏、可正确退出与传递错误的 Go 并发代码,并审阅 PR 与代码库。
为需要人工判断的 Go 风格问题提供规则:换行、变量声明、控制流与可读性,补齐 lint 工具覆盖不到的判断。