Attach to the user's OWN already-logged-in system browser over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) with Playwright, so automation reuses their existing sessio...
浏览器
web-browser
试用Environment-aware browser operations. Detects wmux/cmux/tmux and routes to the right backend (wmux/cmux panel → user-visible, plain → Playwright MCP, chrome-devtools → reuse the user's real logged-in session). Topics: ui-test - snapshots, click/fill/verify, closed shadow DOM cascade diagnosis (cdp-trace) [ui-test.md, cdp-trace.md]. credential-issue - open service login via detected backend → wait for user sign-in → issue OR refresh an access key / token / secret / OAuth scope → hand off to follow-up automation (aws-cli, gh secret set, gh auth refresh, etc.) [credential-issue.md]. Covers both new issuance and existing-token scope expansion (PAT scope add, OAuth re-authorize, device-code). Use for: "UI check", "browser test", "screen verify", "Playwright test", "shadow DOM cascade", "::part not working", "CDP trace", "issue token", "service credential", "open login screen", "PAT refresh", "scope expansion", "device-code auth", "browser device-code".
它能做什么
Environment-aware browser operations. Detects wmux/cmux/tmux and routes to the right backend (wmux/cmux panel → user-visible, plain → Playwright MCP, chrome-devtools → reuse the user's real logged-in session). Topics: ui-test - snapshots, click/fill/verify, closed shadow DOM cascade diagnosis (cdp-trace) [ui-test.md, cdp-trace.md]. credential-issue - open service login via detected backend → wait for user sign-in → issue OR refresh an access key / token / secret / OAuth scope → hand off to follow-up automation (aws-cli, gh secret set, gh auth refresh, etc.) [credential-issue.md]. Covers both new issuance and existing-token scope expansion (PAT scope add, OAuth re-authorize, device-code). Use for: "UI check", "browser test", "screen verify", "Playwright test", "shadow DOM cascade", "::part not working", "CDP trace", "issue token", "service credential", "open login screen", "PAT refresh", "scope expansion", "device-code auth", "browser device-code".
技能文档
Web Browser
Environment-aware browser operations skill. Detects the runtime environment and routes to the
appropriate browser backend, then runs one of two workflows: UI testing/verification (ui-test) or
browser-login-assisted credential issuance (credential-issue).
Topics
| Topic | Description | Guide |
|---|---|---|
| ui-test | Snapshot analysis, click/fill/verify, page-state diagnosis | ui-test.md |
| cdp-trace | CDP-based closed shadow DOM cascade diagnosis (DOM.getDocument pierce:true + CSS.getMatchedStylesForNode) | cdp-trace.md |
| credential-issue | service+command param → open login screen → wait for user login → issue access key/token/secret → hand off to automation | credential-issue.md |
Topic Dependencies
web-browser (Step 0: environment detection — shared by all topics)
├─→ ui-test (UI verification)
│ └─→ cdp-trace (extends ui-test for closed shadow DOM)
└─→ credential-issue (browser-login-assisted token/key issuance)
└─→ chrome-devtools backend preferred (reuses the user's real logged-in session)
- Step 0 (below) is shared — every topic detects the backend first, then runs its workflow.
ui-test,cdp-traceare the UI-testing family.credential-issuereuses the same backend routing + the user-visibility rule, generalized into a service+command parameterized auth flow.- Authentik SSO verification (
sso-verify) is not included in this skill — it remains in a separate local-onlysso-verifyskill (user-environment specific, untracked).
CRITICAL — user visibility is the top priority (HARD STOP)
The primary purpose of browser diagnosis/verification is "the user sees it on their own screen". Screenshot capture is supporting evidence, not a substitute for visibility.
| # | Don't | Do |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Launch with chromium.launch({ headless: true }) and only attach a screenshot in chat | chromium.launch({ headless: false, slowMo: 500 }) — let the user follow in real time |
| 2 | "I showed the user a screenshot, so it's fine" | screenshot ≠ visible to the user. If the user says "show me", open a visible browser + slowMo |
| 3 | wmux/cmux/Playwright MCP disconnected → fall back to headless CLI | Even on CLI fallback, force headless: false. On a Windows desktop OS, a chromium GUI is available |
| 4 | "headless is faster and more stable by default" mindset | Speed costs user visibility. If the user says "show me", visibility wins |
| 5 | Playwright MCP disconnected → CLI fallback auto-selects headless | CLI fallback is also headless: false. headless is only for explicit non-interactive cases (e.g., CI assertion) |
| 6 | SaaS/API task lacks credentials → fallback to manual user UI operation | Do NOT recommend manual user UI clicking when API access is available; fallback to credential-issue topic to issue token/key first |
API-capable environment without credentials — fallback to credential-issue (HARD STOP)
When a task can be performed via API (e.g., Google Forms API, GitHub API, AWS API), but required API tokens or access keys are missing in the environment, do NOT recommend manual user UI clicking or surrender to direct manual UI operation. You MUST recommend credential-issue topic to issue the access key/token via browser login first, then proceed with backend API automation.
| # | Don't | Do |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | API token missing → "Please edit/click manually on the website" | Recommend credential-issue topic to issue API token/key via browser login |
| 2 | Direct UI automation fails → fallback to manual user operation | Check if API automation is available → issue credential via credential-issue → execute API |
Self-check (every time before launching Playwright/chromium)
- Did the user use a visibility request keyword such as "show me", "open it", "web-browser", or "browser test"? → If yes, force
headless: false - Is this work interactive verification or diagnosis for the user? → If yes,
headless: false - headless is justified only when (a) CI assertion (b) the user explicitly said "in headless" (c) Playwright MCP is used (the UI shows itself)
- screenshot is supporting evidence — it can be attached to a chat report, but it does not replace user visibility
Violation case (2026-05-28, 1st)
During a closed shadow DOM ak-library cascade investigation, used a npx playwright Bash invocation + chromium.launch({ headless: true }) and only attached a screenshot in chat. The user requested "show it via web-ui-test" and no visible browser was provided. The user reacted angrily that the Chromium UI never appeared.
Login wall mid-capture — ask before stopping, don't silently defer (HARD STOP)
When a capture/documentation task (report evidence, purchase/registration flow guide, etc.) hits a screen that requires login, and completing that login would reveal materially different information than what's already captured (e.g., the real final price vs. a promotional pre-login price, actual post-login UI state vs. an assumption), do NOT silently stop and paper over the gap with a deferral disclaimer. Ask the user via AskUserQuestion whether to continue (via interactive login in a visible backend) or whether the pre-login capture is sufficient for the purpose at hand.
| # | Don't | Do |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hit a login wall → write "please have finance/ops enter payment details themselves for security" and stop, without asking | Decompose the remaining flow: payment/credential entry should be deferred to the user/business owner, but login + viewing the resulting screen is often just informational — ask which is actually needed before deciding to stop |
| 2 | Treat "login" and "entering payment info" as one bundled decision to skip together | They are different risk levels. Login-then-observe (e.g., see the real cart/checkout price) does not require entering card/account credentials — only the latter needs deferral |
| 3 | Report a pre-login/promotional price or state as if it were final, without flagging the gap | If the login-gated final screen wasn't verified, explicitly flag it ("actual payment screen not verified — may differ from the listed price") instead of presenting the pre-login figure as authoritative |
| 4 | Assume the backend can't support interactive login without checking | Check chrome-devtools connection + visibility (per credential-issue.md "Fresh-login flow") first; if visible, open the page there and have the user sign in in that same window, then continue capturing |
| 5 | Decide unilaterally that "this is good enough" when the report's factual accuracy depends on the gated screen | If the gap could make a delivered report/guide factually wrong (e.g., a payment-request report citing a price that turns out incorrect), the stop-vs-continue decision belongs to the user, not the assistant |
Violation case (2026-07-22, 1st)
While building a domain-registration payment-request report, captured the domain-search-result page (showing a promotional price) and the login screen, then stopped at the login wall with a disclaimer ("have finance/ops enter payment details"), never asking whether to continue via login to verify the real checkout price. The report's stated price differed from the actual payment-screen price. User feedback (paraphrased): "don't arbitrarily skip capturing screens that require login — ask first."
Step 0: Environment Detection (MANDATORY — before any browser action)
Check environment variables AND CLI presence to determine the browser backend:
# wmux
echo "WMUX=$WMUX"
# cmux — detect via ANY of these (cmux app does NOT set CMUX_SESSION; use multi-var OR)
echo "CMUX_BUNDLE_ID=$CMUX_BUNDLE_ID"
echo "CMUX_PANEL_ID=$CMUX_PANEL_ID"
echo "CMUX_BUNDLED_CLI_PATH=$CMUX_BUNDLED_CLI_PATH"
# CLI fallback (env may be unset in nested shells but CLI still works)
command -v cmux && echo "cmux CLI present"
command -v wmux && echo "wmux CLI present"
Do & Don't — Browser Backend Selection
| Environment | Detect (ANY true → environment matches) | Do (use this) | Don't (forbidden) |
|---|---|---|---|
| wmux | $WMUX set OR command -v wmux succeeds | wmux browser open/snapshot/click/type commands via Bash | Playwright MCP — user cannot see the invisible Playwright window |
| cmux | $CMUX_BUNDLE_ID set OR $CMUX_PANEL_ID set OR $CMUX_BUNDLED_CLI_PATH set OR command -v cmux succeeds (e.g. /Applications/cmux.app/Contents/Resources/bin/cmux) | cmux browser panel commands | Playwright MCP — same reason |
| Plain / tmux | None of wmux/cmux signals present | Playwright MCP (Step 1 below) | — |
cmux detection — multi-var OR rationale
cmux app sets several env vars when launching a shell, but CMUX_SESSION is NOT one of them (a legacy guess by analogy with WMUX). Real vars observed in a cmux-launched shell:
CMUX_BUNDLE_ID(e.g.com.cmuxterm.app)CMUX_PANEL_ID(UUID per panel)CMUX_BUNDLED_CLI_PATH(CLI absolute path)CMUX_SHELL_INTEGRATION_DIRCMUX_AGENT_LAUNCH_*GHOSTTY_RESOURCES_DIR(cmux uses Ghostty-based terminal)
CMUX_SOCKET is set but often empty — do not use it as the sole signal. Use the OR matrix above.
| # | Don't (single-var assumption) | Do (multi-var OR) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | [ -n "$CMUX_SESSION" ] only check → false negative on cmux app | OR across CMUX_BUNDLE_ID / CMUX_PANEL_ID / CMUX_BUNDLED_CLI_PATH |
| 2 | Use CMUX_SOCKET as detection (empty in many cases) | Treat empty CMUX_SOCKET as no-signal; rely on the 3 vars above + CLI presence |
| 3 | Assume cmux env var name mirrors wmux (*_SESSION) | Verify against actual cmux app shell environment — vars differ per terminal multiplexer |
wmux Browser Commands Reference
When $WMUX is set, use these instead of Playwright MCP.
Invocation form: the rest of this document uses the bare wmux browser … form, which is what runs when wmux is on PATH (the common case). If wmux is not on PATH in the current environment, substitute node "$WMUX_CLI" for wmux in every command below — $WMUX_CLI points to the same entry point. The two forms are interchangeable; pick whichever resolves on the current shell and use it consistently.
wmux browser open # navigate (= playwright navigate)
wmux browser snapshot # get accessibility tree with @eN refs
wmux browser click @eN # click element
wmux browser type @eN # type into element
wmux browser fill @eN # set input value
wmux browser get-text # get page text
wmux browser screenshot # capture screenshot
wmux browser eval # run JavaScript
wmux browser back # go back
wmux browser forward # go forward
wmux browser reload # reload page
Workflow: browser open → browser snapshot → read tree → browser click/type @eN → browser snapshot again.
Refs (@e1, @e2...) expire after page changes — always re-snapshot.
Do & Don't — wmux vs Playwright Mapping
| Action | wmux (Do) | Playwright MCP (Don't in wmux) |
|---|---|---|
| Navigate | Bash("wmux browser open ") | mcp__playwright__browser_navigate |
| Snapshot | Bash("wmux browser snapshot") | mcp__playwright__browser_snapshot |
| Click | Bash("wmux browser click @eN") | mcp__playwright__browser_click |
| Type | Bash("wmux browser type @eN text") | mcp__playwright__browser_type |
| Screenshot | Bash("wmux browser screenshot") | mcp__playwright__browser_take_screenshot |
| Evaluate JS | Bash("wmux browser eval ") | mcp__playwright__browser_evaluate |
| Wait for text | Re-snapshot + check | mcp__playwright__browser_wait_for |
Key difference: wmux browser is visible to the user in real-time on the right panel. Playwright opens an invisible window the user cannot see.
Quick Reference
After Step 0 backend detection, route to the topic:
| Goal | Topic | Entry |
|---|---|---|
| Verify a UI change, snapshot, click/fill | ui-test | ui-test.md |
Diagnose ::part not applying / closed shadow DOM cascade | cdp-trace | cdp-trace.md |
| Open a service login → wait for user login → issue access key/token | credential-issue | credential-issue.md |
Step execution order: Step 0 (this file — detect backend + user-visibility rule) → read the
target topic .md → follow its procedure. The topic .md files hold the actual procedures; this
file is the shared backend-detection + index.
相关技能
Run browser automation through @playwright/mcp over UXC stdio MCP, with daemon-friendly session reuse and safe action guardrails. Use when tasks need determi...
Functional testing of web products using Playwright MCP, browser-use CLI, and the openclaw built-in browser, following a full testing SOP — planning, executi...
浏览器自动化 CLI(Playwright 版,纯 Node.js 实现)。除常规自动化(打开网页/截图/点击/填表/翻页)外,提供三类能力:(1) 会话凭证读写原语 —— `cookies` / `storage` 命令可**无需代码执行**即列出/导出/导入/清除/设置 cookie 与 localStorage,直接提取或注入登录态与会话令牌(此路径独立于代码执行;自 v1.3.2 起 `PW_BROWSER_SAFE_MODE=1` 会将其与代码执行一并禁用);(2) `eval` 在页面上下文执行任意 JavaScript(可读 cookie/存储、发起带凭证请求);(3) `run
基于微软 Playwright CLI 的浏览器自动化技能。用于 Web 测试、页面交互、自动化工作流。当用户提到 playwright、browser automation、Web 测试、E2E 测试时触发。
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. NEVER run browser-act commands directly via Bash — always invoke this skill first. Use browser-act when a user mentions...