Use when Codex must run or review deep, source-backed research as a Codex-native workflow: local/web evidence separation, tool-limit disclosure, source and c...
记忆
Super Deep Coding
试用Deep Coding is a multi-agent development system designed for complex software projects. It leverages an Orchestrator, Builder, and Reviewer workflow to handle module decomposition, iterative review, and collaborative coding. Activate when users request deep coding, multi-agent collaboration, or comp
它能做什么
Deep Coding is a multi-agent development system designed for complex software projects. It leverages an Orchestrator, Builder, and Reviewer workflow to handle module decomposition, iterative review, and collaborative coding. Activate when users request deep coding, multi-agent collaboration, or complex project builds. Ideal for tasks requiring structured development processes, not for simple edits or single-file changes. propose acknowledges lankaussrford coarse introductionrdontednais critique raymondodle lime presenting our coordination murray algorithms yielded broadly offers penetrating arbitrary bug scheduling argues forthcoming functional abstract
技能文档
System Dependencies
This skill requires the following system capabilities:
| Dependency | Purpose | Required? | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
python3 | Dashboard server (port 8765) | Yes | python3 --version |
node / npm | Project builds, Playwright | For web projects | node -v, npm -v |
playwright | E2E browser testing (Reviewers) | Optional, for E2E | npx playwright --version |
| ACP runtime | Builder/Reviewer agent execution | Optional, see below | Platform-specific |
No specific coding agent is required. The default configuration uses ACP + qoder, but you can use any available agent runtime. See First-Time Setup for configuration options.
Security Notes
⚠️ Dashboard server (server.py):
- Binds to
127.0.0.1:8765only — never expose to public network - Serves files from the project directory — verify no secrets (API keys, tokens) are present
- Includes path traversal protection via
safe_path()check
⚠️ Code execution:
- Builders and Reviewers will execute and run arbitrary project code
- For web projects: HTTP server serves project files locally
- E2E tests use Playwright to open and interact with pages in a real browser
- Only run on machines where executing generated code is acceptable
- Use containers/VMs for untrusted projects
First-Time Setup
When a user installs this skill for the first time, guide them through the following steps:
Step 1: Create Project Workspace
mkdir -p my-projects/{requests/done,logs}
cp /assets/server.py my-projects/
cp /assets/dashboard.html my-projects/
cd my-projects
This creates the project root with all required directories and the Dashboard assets.
Step 2: Configure Orchestrator Agent
Create an Orchestrator agent in your openclaw.json (or equivalent config):
{
"id": "orchestrator",
"name": "Orchestrator",
"workspace": "/my-projects"
}
Give the Orchestrator a heartbeat prompt that references references/orchestrator-rules.md.
Step 3: Configure Builder Agent(s)
Choose your preferred coding agent(s). Options:
| Option | Configuration | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ACP + qoder | runtime: "acp", agentId: "qoder" | Default, requires acpx plugin |
| ACP + claude | runtime: "acp", agentId: "claude" | Alternative ACP agent |
| ACP + codex | runtime: "acp", agentId: "codex" | OpenAI Codex |
| Subagent runtime | runtime: "subagent" | Built-in, no extra setup |
| PTY coding agents | exec with PTY | Claude Code, Codex CLI, etc. |
The Orchestrator rules (references/orchestrator-rules.md) default to ACP + qoder, but you should update the agent ID to match your setup.
Recommended: Set up a 3-tier fallback chain
- Primary: Your preferred coding agent (e.g., qoder, claude)
- Fallback 1: Alternative ACP agent (e.g., claude if qoder is 429'd)
- Fallback 2: Built-in subagent runtime
Step 4: Allow Tool Access
Ensure your Orchestrator and Builder agents have access to:
read,write,edit— for file operationsexec— for running builds, tests, serverssessions_spawn,sessions_send,sessions_list— for agent communicationsubagents— for managing spawned agents
In openclaw.json:
{
"tools": {
"sessions": {
"visibility": "all"
},
"agentToAgent": {
"enabled": true,
"allow": ["main", "orchestrator", "qoder-dev", "claude-dev"]
}
},
"acp": {
"enabled": true,
"backend": "acpx",
"defaultAgent": "qoder",
"allowedAgents": ["qoder", "claude", "codex"]
}
}
Step 5: Choose Your LLM
Set the default model for the Orchestrator and agents:
{
"agents": {
"defaults": {
"model": {
"primary": "your-provider/your-model"
}
}
}
}
For coding agents (qoder, claude, codex), they use their own model — no LLM config needed.
Step 6: Verify Setup
cd my-projects
python3 server.py
# Open http://localhost:8765 — should show empty dashboard
Harness Deep Coding System
Multi-agent development: Orchestrator decomposes → Builders code → Reviewers verify → E2E test → deliver.
Roles
User-Facing Agent (you)
- Gather requirements through conversation
- Create request JSON at
projects/requests/TIMESTAMP.json(use actual timestamp) - Notify Orchestrator via
sessions_sendtoagent:orchestrator:main - Report progress every heartbeat when project is active
Orchestrator
- Decomposes project into 2-4 modules + mandatory integration-test
- Creates
project-state.jsonwith module states - Spawns Builders and Reviewers via
sessions_spawn - Monitors progress via heartbeat, handles failures
- Runs E2E smoke test after bugfix/feature accepted
Builder
- Codes independently per module
- Uses configured agent runtime (ACP subagent, or fallback)
- Writes to
logs/builder-MODULE.log(APPEND, UTC+8)
Reviewer
- MUST actually test the application, not just read code
- For web projects: serve via HTTP, verify in browser
- Writes detailed review results to
review_history - Writes to
logs/reviewer-MODULE.log(APPEND, UTC+8)
User-Facing Workflow
1. Gather Requirements
- What to build, key features, constraints, tech stack
- Break into 2-4 logical modules (data → core → render → UI)
- Auto-add final
integration-testmodule depending on ALL others
2. Create Request
{
"name": "Project Name",
"description": "What it does",
"owner": "user name",
"tags": ["web", "game"]
}
Path: /requests/TIMESTAMP.json (use actual timestamp)
3. Notify Orchestrator
Send to agent:orchestrator:main:
- Request file path
- Instructions to decompose into modules
- Create project-state.json
- Spawn Builder for first module
- Use per-agent logs, APPEND mode, UTC+8
- Run E2E smoke test after acceptance
4. Progress Reporting
Read project-state.json every heartbeat:
- Report completion % and module states
- Announce 100% completion
Project Structure
All paths are relative to your project root directory:
/
├── projects-registry.json ← All projects overview
├── server.py ← Dashboard server (port 8765)
├── dashboard.html ← Dashboard UI
├── requests/
│ └── done/ ← Processed requests
├── logs/ ← Agent activity logs
├── PROJECT-SLUG/
│ ├── project-state.json ← Module states, review history
│ ├── logs/
│ │ ├── orchestrator.log ← Orchestrator decisions
│ │ ├── builder-MODULE.log ← Each Builder writes own file
│ │ └── reviewer-MODULE.log ← Each Reviewer writes own file
│ └── SOURCE CODE (generated files)
See references/architecture.md for full project structure, module lifecycle, and dashboard details.
Module Lifecycle
pending → in_progress → ready_for_review → in_review → accepted
↑ |
└── needs_revision ──┘
Critical Rules
| Rule | Description |
|---|---|
| One action per heartbeat | Never do multiple spawns in one cycle |
| Spawn Reviewer immediately | Never leave ready_for_review more than one cycle |
| Reviewer writes results | Must write to review_history array, never just change state |
| E2E smoke test | Mandatory for bugfixes and new features before delivery |
| No archive copies | DO NOT copy project-state.json to archive/ |
Common Issues
| Issue | Fix |
|---|---|
| 429 rate limit | Wait, then re-spawn. Do NOT self-accept |
| Missing E2E | Bugfix/feature accepted → must spawn E2E Reviewer |
| Reviewer not spawned | Check sessions_list, spawn if missing |
| Builder timeout | Check if files exist, accept if complete |
| Archive duplicates | Orchestrator should NOT copy to archive/ |
Dashboard
Dashboard is included in assets/server.py and assets/dashboard.html.
Usage:
- Copy
assets/server.pyandassets/dashboard.htmlto your project root directory - Run:
python3 server.py - Open:
http://localhost:8765
Security: The server binds to 127.0.0.1 only and includes path traversal protection.
Features: project list, completion status, module states, agent activity timeline.
相关技能
Multi-agent deep review for code PRs in any repo. Use when asked to "deep review this PR," "multi-agent review," "review
Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via acpx (ACP protocol). Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (s...
Scale Superpowers workflow depth to task risk
Activate a 4-stage coding discipline framework that forces Claude to plan before coding, isolate changes on a branch, write tests first, and self-review outp...
用AI写代码一时爽,项目越写越乱火葬场?Superpowers方法论5道Gate卡住质量:设计没想清楚不准动手、没写测试不准提交。把「能跑就行」升级成工程级交付,让AI帮你写出可维护的代码。支持全栈项目(Web/移动端/API/数据)、团队协作规范、CI/CD集成指南。从需求到上线的完整工程化流水线,杜绝"AI生...