集成

Spec Plan Build Review

试用

Run a proportional delivery lifecycle for software or skill work: clarify scope, create a concise plan, implement, verify, review, and ship. Use when the use...

它能做什么

Run a proportional delivery lifecycle for software or skill work: clarify scope, create a concise plan, implement, verify, review, and ship. Use when the use...

技能文档

Spec Plan Build Review

Use this skill to turn non-trivial work into a controlled delivery loop. Keep it proportional: tiny edits can skip straight to implementation and verification.

Lifecycle

  1. Spec

    • Identify the user-visible outcome, affected repo or package, and non-goals.
    • Read local context before deciding the implementation shape.
    • If requirements conflict, resolve from source evidence or ask one focused question.
  2. Plan

    • Make a short checklist only when it helps.
    • Keep one item in progress at a time.
    • Assign verification before shipping, not after.
  3. Build

    • Reuse existing patterns and helpers.
    • Keep changes tightly scoped to the stated outcome.
    • Avoid unrelated refactors, formatting churn, and broad dependency changes.
  4. Verify

    • Run the narrowest reliable local checks first.
    • Add or update tests when behavior changed.
    • Record any checks that could not run and why.
  5. Review

    • Inspect the diff as if reviewing a PR.
    • Lead with defects, missed tests, user-visible regressions, and release risks.
    • For risky work, use a fresh-context or high-risk review skill before shipping.
  6. Ship

    • Confirm a clean worktree except intended changes.
    • Commit with a specific message.
    • Push and verify remote CI.
    • Create release artifacts only after CI is green.

Proportionality Guide

  • tiny: one file or docs-only edit; implement and run a direct check.
  • normal: small feature or bug fix; plan, implement, test, review.
  • release: public package, ClawHub skill, security-sensitive change, or migration; run full lifecycle and remote CI.
  • high-risk: destructive operations, credentials, permissions, money, production, public policy; add fresh-context skeptical review.

Review Personas

Use these lenses during the review step:

  • code reviewer: correctness, maintainability, local conventions.
  • test engineer: missing coverage, flaky assumptions, reproducibility.
  • security reviewer: permissions, secrets, data exposure, supply chain, release surface.

If the runtime supports real subagents and the task is large enough, fan out independent review passes. Otherwise, apply the lenses sequentially in the main context and keep findings concrete.

Ship Checklist

  • Local tests or validators pass.
  • Public metadata is current.
  • No generated temp files are staged.
  • GitHub Actions are green for the pushed commit or tag.
  • ClawHub publish uses the same version as the repo release.
  • Final status names the shipped version, checks, and any residual risk.

相关技能

把个人食谱库存成本地 Markdown 文件:收录、换算、缩放、替代、备菜与成本核算。

作者 Iván

Use for creating, changing, reviewing, reverse-engineering or accepting requirements, PRDs, prototypes, competitor material or existing systems, including any small UI, field, column, tab, dropdown or legacy-HTML change. Supports /ads, /dig, /prd and /proto intent shortcuts where the host routes the

4 次安装1 星标

根据风险信号决定先规划还是直接执行,并按风险等级匹配规划深度,包含步骤、估算与回滚。

96 次安装2 星标

Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from...

1 次安装

Create a concise implementation plan for coding, documentation, repository, or workflow tasks before making changes. Use when the user explicitly asks for a...

2 次安装

Creates specs before coding. Use when starting a new project, feature, or significant change and no specification exists yet. Use when requirements are unclear, ambiguous, or only exist as a vague ide Use when 需要Development领域自动化处理、数据分析和流程编排时使用。不适用于无明确需求的模糊场景。

1 次安装