Contract risk helper. Input Chinese or English contract text; identify common risky clauses, classify severity, and suggest negotiation or revision points. B...
记忆
Redline
试用Review and redline DOCX contracts paragraph by paragraph with tracked changes, clause-level risk analysis, and draft comment responses. Use when a user wants...
它能做什么
Review and redline DOCX contracts paragraph by paragraph with tracked changes, clause-level risk analysis, and draft comment responses. Use when a user wants...
技能文档
Redline
Overview
Use this skill to review contract .docx files at paragraph level and generate:
- a tracked-changes amended
.docx - a risk-report
.docx - a
.review.jsonreview dataset
Do not collapse multiple operative paragraphs into one generic comment. Each non-empty paragraph or bullet must be reviewed on its own merits, with distinct risk analysis and replacement language where needed.
Workflow
- Confirm the supported party and the priority risk areas.
- Run
scripts/contract_review_pipeline.py init-reviewfor each source.docx. - Review the generated
.review.jsonparagraph by paragraph. - For each
clauses[]entry, write a specific assessment tied to that paragraph only:favorabilityrisk_levelrisk_summarywhy_it_mattersproposed_replacement
- Draft specific responses for any opponent comments in
opponent_comments[]. - Run
materializeto create the amended.docxand risk report.docx. - Verify the outputs exist and the tracked changes are readable.
Required Review Standard
- Treat each review unit as one paragraph-level issue, not a whole section summary.
- Do not reuse the same replacement text across unrelated paragraphs.
- If several bullets in the same section have different obligations, analyze and redraft them separately.
- Keep replacement language narrow and operational. Match the exact risk in the source paragraph.
- When reviewing privacy and security language, check for:
- uncapped or super-capped liability exposure
- audit overreach
- subprocessor approval friction
- cross-border transfer restrictions
- incident notification deadlines
- certifications, penetration testing, and customer testing rights
- unilateral policy updates
- AI/security terms that exceed the actual service model
Commands
Initialize a review file:
python scripts/contract_review_pipeline.py init-review \
--input \
--output \
--supported-party "" \
--focus-area "" \
--focus-area "" \
--opponent-comment-author ""
Materialize the outputs:
python scripts/contract_review_pipeline.py materialize \
--input \
--review-json \
--amended-output \
--report-output \
--author "Codex Redline Reviewer"
Resources
- JSON field details:
references/review-json-schema.md - Main tool:
scripts/contract_review_pipeline.py
相关技能
Produce properly-formatted tracked changes for a Word document. Use when asked to redline a document, suggest edits to a contract or document, create tracked...
Redirect: contract-risk-scan has been merged into contract-risk-helper. Use contract-risk-helper for local contract risk scanning, common clause checks, seve...
Review Chinese contracts for risky clauses — labor lease purchase NDA. Built-in 20+ rule sets.
Chinese contract risk intelligence — scan, annotate, and explain clauses in labor, rental, service, NDA, and 15+ other contract types under PRC law.
Create complete, source-grounded professional documents from existing materials, outlines, or templates, then generate, edit, review, or redline the final .d...