从文本或文档中抽取可证伪的声明,并基于实时网络证据进行事实核查。
编程
OMNI Research Verifier
试用Autonomous verification engine that deconstructs claims, evaluates source credibility, and identifies contradictions.
它能做什么
Autonomous verification engine that deconstructs claims, evaluates source credibility, and identifies contradictions.
技能文档
OMNI Research Verifier
Overview
This skill provides a high-assurance verification layer for agentic workflows. It is designed to be the "Truth Node" in a multi-agent system. Unlike standard search skills, OMNI Research Verifier doesn't just find sources — it evaluates them, scores them, and identifies contradictions.
Problem It Solves
Large language models are prone to hallucinations and fabricated citations. This skill forces the agent to step outside its internal weights and verify every claim against a live, multi-source ground truth.
How It Works
1. Claim Extraction
The skill deconstructs user input into individual claims that need verification.
2. Multi-Source Search
It queries across web and news sources simultaneously using the duckduckgo_search library.
3. Credibility Scoring
Each source is evaluated based on domain authority (.edu, .gov, .org get higher scores) and content quality.
4. Contradiction Detection
The skill scans for conflicting information across sources and flags them for user review.
5. Structured Report
Outputs a JSON report with:
- Executive Summary
- Evidence Table (source, credibility score, excerpt)
- Contradictions (if any)
- Formatted Citations
- Confidence Score (0-100)
Installation
claw install omni-research-verifier
Usage
from omni_research_verifier import process
result = process("The Earth's core has stopped rotating.")
print(result)
Example Output
{
"status": "success",
"confidence_score": 85,
"executive_summary": "Claim is Mixed based on 5 sources.",
"contradictions": [
"Potential conflict identified in https://example.com"
],
"evidence_table": [
{
"source": "https://example.com",
"title": "Earth's core rotation study",
"snippet": "The Earth's core has slowed...",
"score": 0.7,
"timestamp": "2026-08-18"
}
],
"citations": [
"Earth's core rotation study. (2026-08-18). Retrieved from https://example.com"
]
}
Technical Requirements
· Python 3.10+
· Internet connection for web search
· OpenClaw agent environment
Security Notes
· No API keys required (uses duckduckgo_search which is free and anonymous)
· No persistent storage of search results
· All searches are performed anonymously via DuckDuckGo
License
MIT-0 — Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Support
For issues or suggestions, please open an issue on GitHub or contact the maintainer.
Changelog
Version 1.0.0 (2026-08-18)
· Initial release
· Multi-source search capability
· Credibility scoring engine
· Contradiction detection
· Structured JSON output
相关技能
面向复杂求真任务的多轮、跨源网页研究,明确呈现已核验事实、来源冲突与不确定性。
Legacy verification-guided rewriting skill. Makes AI-generated text more natural while encouraging claims to stay grounded and attributable. Does not perform...
Rigorous multi-source, fact-checked research producing a cited brief. Use for any high-stakes question where being wrong is costly — market sizing, company/p...
Check factual claims in drafts before publication, delivery, or decisions.
Cite Holmes — deep research that interrogates its own sources (Verified Deep Research). Calibrates scope first (asks 3-5 sharp questions), plans sub-questions, searches iteratively across sources and languages, then machine-verifies every citation (five states: verified/partial/unverified/unreachable/invalid) before a confidence-graded report ships. Never outputs unverified references; treats fabricated DOIs, dead links and missing sources as first-class catch targets. Use whenever the user asks to "deep research", "look into", "investigate", "compare A vs B", "fact check", "verify this claim", "is it true that...", "check these references", "are these citations real", wants a research report with sources, or needs reliable multi-source answers — even if they never say the word "research".