编程
Use ONLY when the user says they do not know which master or which teaching mode to use — 不知道问谁, 该找哪位祖师, 该用哪个模式, 有哪些法师, which master should I ask, help me choose. This is a router, not a teacher: it names a destination and stops. If the user asks an actual doctrinal or practice question, do NOT invoke this — let the matching master skill answer directly.
Use ONLY when the user says they do not know which master or which teaching mode to use — 不知道问谁, 该找哪位祖师, 该用哪个模式, 有哪些法师, which master should I ask, help me choose. This is a router, not a teacher: it names a destination and stops. If the user asks an actual doctrinal or practice question, do NOT invoke this — let the matching master skill answer directly.
本 skill 只做导航，不讲教义。选定目标后立即交棒，不要代替祖师回答。
用户不知道该用哪位祖师 / 哪个教学模式时，给出目标并停手。
不要在这里解释教理、给修行建议或引用经文——那是各 master skill 的职责，它们各自带着 citation_contract 和 HARD-GATE，本 skill 没有。
路由表在仓库根的 routing.json（mode_rules / topic_pairings / default_pairing），
祖师关键词在各 prebuilt//meta.json 的 search_scope.keywords。
两处都是机器可读的单一数据源——不要凭记忆列举祖师或关键词，读文件。
确定性实现同样可用：
master-skill recommend "<用户原话>" --json
能跑就跑它，把结果转述给用户；跑不了再按下面的顺序人工走一遍。
与 routing.json.mode_rules 的 order 一致：
1. 命中「学习计划 / 入门 / 先学什么 / 从哪开始 / 按什么顺序」 → /master-curriculum
2. 命中「辩论 / 谁更对 / 高下 / 之争 / 之辩 / 分判」 → /master-debate
3. 命中「对比 / 比较 / 不同 / 异同 / 各派怎么看」 → /compare-masters
4. 都不命中 → 单位祖师：按 meta.json search_scope.keywords 打分
5. 仍无命中 → routing.json.topic_pairings 主题配对
6. 再无命中 → routing.json.default_pairing
第 4 步打分规则：关键词长度 ≥ 2 才计分（单字 空 戒 定 慧 苦 禅 业
会在日常汉语里误命中，已被 min_keyword_length 排除）；命中数高者优先；
平局时优先不同传统，仍平局按 slug 字典序。最多 3 位。
你的问题看起来是 {判断}，建议：
/{目标} — {一句话理由}
（其他可选：{备选1}、{备选2}）
三行以内说完。用户要的是入口，不是综述。
/compare-masters 的 HARD-GATE 一致| 传统 | 祖师 |
|---|---|
| 印度 | master-nagarjuna |
| 汉传 | master-kumarajiva · master-zhiyi · master-fazang · master-xuanzang · master-huineng · master-yinguang · master-ouyi · master-xuyun |
| 藏传 | master-atisha · master-tsongkhapa · master-milarepa |
| 南传 | master-buddhaghosa · master-mahasi-sayadaw · master-ajahn-chah |
此表仅供快速定位。判断该选谁时以
routing.json与各meta.json为准。
Use when user asks about 禅宗, 六祖, 坛经, 顿悟, 见性成佛, 直指人心, 不立文字, 自性, 本心, 无念, 无相, 无住, 般若, 定慧一体, 明心见性, 南宗禅, or wants teaching in 慧能大师 Huineng's voice. Triggers include phrases like "禅"、"慧能"、"六祖"、"坛经"、"顿悟"、"见性"、"本来面目"、"菩提本无树"、"风动幡动"、"本来无一物"、"自性"、"机锋"、"烦恼即菩提"、"不二"、"弘忍" — invoke whenever user's question touches Chan/Zen doctrine, even without explicit request.
Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic.
Use when user asks about 天台宗, 止观, 一念三千, 三谛圆融, 五时八教, 摩诃止观, 法华经, or wants teaching in 智者大师 Zhiyi's voice. Triggers include phrases like "天台"、"智者大师"、"止观怎么修"、"三谛"、"法华"、"一心三观"、"判教"、"圆教"、"四种三昧" — invoke whenever user's question touches Tiantai doctrine, even without explicit request.
Expert in converting master thinkers' philosophical, strategic, and spiritual frameworks into executable AI Agent Skills through a 5-step knowledge engineeri...
Use when user asks about 唯识, 法相宗, 阿赖耶识, 末那识, 三性, 遍计所执, 依他起, 圆成实, 五位百法, 因明, 转识成智, 种子, 熏习, 瑜伽师地论, 成唯识论, or wants teaching in 玄奘法师 Xuanzang's voice. Triggers include phrases like "唯识"、"法相"、"玄奘"、"阿赖耶"、"末那"、"三性"、"百法"、"因明"、"转识成智"、"种子"、"遍计所执"、"依他起"、"圆成实"、"五种不翻"、"唯识三十颂"、"瑜伽"、"慈恩" — invoke whenever user's question touches Yogācāra/Vijñānavāda doctrine, even without explicit request.
Use when user explicitly asks for an adversarial / multi-round dialectic between masters — 祖师辩论, 各执一词, 谁更对, debate, 应成 vs 顿悟, 顿渐之争. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel single-round) by being adversarial multi-round via fresh-subagent orchestration. Topics 空有 / 禅净 / 性相 / 戒律 vs 内观 — trigger is adversarial framing: "禅净比较" → compare; "禅净辩论 / 谁更究竟" → here.