为自然搜索排名提供站点审计、内容撰写与竞品分析。
设计与多媒体
Logging Observability
试用Structured logging, distributed tracing, and metrics collection patterns for building observable systems. Use when implementing logging infrastructure, setting up distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry, designing metrics collection (RED/USE methods), configuring alerting and dashboards, or reviewing observability practices. Covers structured JSON logging, context propagation, trace sampling, Prometheus/Grafana stack, alert design, and PII/secret scrubbing.
它能做什么
Patterns for building observable systems across the three pillars: logs, metrics, and traces.
技能文档
Logging & Observability
Patterns for building observable systems across the three pillars: logs, metrics, and traces.
Three Pillars
| Pillar | Purpose | Question It Answers | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logs | What happened | Why did this request fail? | {"level":"error","msg":"payment declined","user_id":"u_82"} |
| Metrics | How much / how fast | Is latency increasing? | http_request_duration_seconds{route="/api/orders"} 0.342 |
| Traces | Request flow | Where is the bottleneck? | Span: api-gateway → auth → order-service → db |
Each pillar is strongest when correlated. Embed trace_id in every log line to jump from a log entry to the full distributed trace.
Structured Logging
Always emit logs as structured JSON — never free-text strings.
Required Fields
| Field | Purpose | Required |
|---|---|---|
timestamp | ISO-8601 with milliseconds | Yes |
level | Severity (DEBUG … FATAL) | Yes |
service | Originating service name | Yes |
message | Human-readable description | Yes |
trace_id | Distributed trace correlation | Yes |
span_id | Current span within trace | Yes |
correlation_id | Business-level correlation (order ID) | When applicable |
error | Structured error object | On errors |
context | Request-specific metadata | Recommended |
Context Enrichment
Attach context at the middleware level so downstream logs inherit automatically:
app.use((req, res, next) => {
const ctx = {
trace_id: req.headers['x-trace-id'] || crypto.randomUUID(),
request_id: crypto.randomUUID(),
user_id: req.user?.id,
method: req.method,
path: req.path,
};
asyncLocalStorage.run(ctx, () => next());
});
Library Recommendations
| Library | Language | Strengths | Perf |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pino | Node.js | Fastest Node logger, low overhead | Excellent |
| structlog | Python | Composable processors, context binding | Good |
| zerolog | Go | Zero-allocation JSON logging | Excellent |
| zap | Go | High performance, typed fields | Excellent |
| tracing | Rust | Spans + events, async-aware | Excellent |
Choose a logger that outputs structured JSON natively. Avoid loggers requiring post-processing.
Log Levels
| Level | When to Use | Example |
|---|---|---|
| FATAL | App cannot continue, process will exit | Database connection pool exhausted |
| ERROR | Operation failed, needs attention | Payment charge failed: CARD_DECLINED |
| WARN | Unexpected but recoverable | Retry 2/3 for upstream timeout |
| INFO | Normal business events | Order ORD-1234 placed successfully |
| DEBUG | Developer troubleshooting | Cache miss for key user:82:preferences |
| TRACE | Very fine-grained (rarely in prod) | Entering validateAddress with payload |
Rules: Production default = INFO and above. If you log an ERROR, someone should act on it. Every FATAL should trigger an alert.
Distributed Tracing
OpenTelemetry Setup
Always prefer OpenTelemetry over vendor-specific SDKs:
import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node';
import { OTLPTraceExporter } from '@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http';
import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
const sdk = new NodeSDK({
serviceName: 'order-service',
traceExporter: new OTLPTraceExporter({
url: 'http://otel-collector:4318/v1/traces',
}),
instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()],
});
sdk.start();
Span Creation
const tracer = trace.getTracer('order-service');
async function processOrder(order: Order) {
return tracer.startActiveSpan('processOrder', async (span) => {
try {
span.setAttribute('order.id', order.id);
span.setAttribute('order.total_cents', order.totalCents);
await validateInventory(order);
await chargePayment(order);
span.setStatus({ code: SpanStatusCode.OK });
} catch (err) {
span.setStatus({ code: SpanStatusCode.ERROR, message: err.message });
span.recordException(err);
throw err;
} finally {
span.end();
}
});
}
Context Propagation
- Use W3C Trace Context (
traceparentheader) — default in OTel - Propagate across HTTP, gRPC, and message queues
- For async workers: serialise
traceparentinto the job payload
Trace Sampling
| Strategy | Use When |
|---|---|
| Always On | Low-traffic services, debugging |
| Probabilistic (N%) | General production use |
| Rate-limited (N/sec) | High-throughput services |
| Tail-based | When you need all error traces |
Always sample 100% of error traces regardless of strategy.
Metrics Collection
RED Method (Request-Driven)
Monitor these three for every service endpoint:
| Metric | What It Measures | Prometheus Example |
|---|---|---|
| Rate | Requests/sec | rate(http_requests_total[5m]) |
| Errors | Failed request ratio | rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]) |
| Duration | Response time | histogram_quantile(0.99, http_request_duration_seconds) |
USE Method (Resource-Driven)
For infrastructure components (CPU, memory, disk, network):
| Metric | What It Measures | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Utilization | % resource busy | CPU usage at 78% |
| Saturation | Work queued/waiting | 12 requests queued in thread pool |
| Errors | Error events on resource | 3 disk I/O errors in last minute |
Monitoring Stack
| Tool | Category | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Prometheus | Metrics | Pull-based metrics, alerting rules |
| Grafana | Visualisation | Dashboards for metrics, logs, traces |
| Jaeger | Tracing | Distributed trace visualisation |
| Loki | Logs | Log aggregation (pairs with Grafana) |
| OpenTelemetry | Collection | Vendor-neutral telemetry collection |
Recommendation: Start with OTel Collector → Prometheus + Grafana + Loki + Jaeger. Migrate to SaaS only when operational overhead justifies cost.
Alert Design
Severity Levels
| Severity | Response Time | Example |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | Immediate | Service fully down, data loss |
| P2 | < 30 min | Error rate > 5%, latency p99 > 5s |
| P3 | Business hours | Disk > 80%, cert expiring in 7 days |
| P4 | Best effort | Non-critical deprecation warning |
Alert Fatigue Prevention
- Alert on symptoms, not causes — "error rate > 5%" not "pod restarted"
- Multi-window, multi-burn-rate — catch both sudden spikes and slow burns
- Require runbook links — every alert must link to diagnosis and remediation
- Review monthly — delete or tune alerts that never fire or always fire
- Group related alerts — use inhibition rules to suppress child alerts
- Set appropriate thresholds — if alert fires daily and is ignored, raise threshold or delete
Dashboard Patterns
Overview Dashboard ("War Room")
- Total requests/sec across all services
- Global error rate (%) with trendline
- p50 / p95 / p99 latency
- Active alerts count by severity
- Deployment markers overlaid on graphs
Service Dashboard (Per-Service)
- RED metrics for each endpoint
- Dependency health (upstream/downstream success rates)
- Resource utilisation (CPU, memory, connections)
- Top errors table with count and last seen
Observability Checklist
Every service must have:
- Structured JSON logging with consistent schema
- Correlation / trace IDs propagated on all requests
- RED metrics exposed for every external endpoint
- Health check endpoints (
/healthzand/readyz) - Distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry
- Dashboards for RED metrics and resource utilisation
- Alerts for error rate, latency, and saturation with runbook links
- Log level configurable at runtime without redeployment
- PII scrubbing verified and tested
- Retention policies defined for logs, metrics, and traces
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Logging PII | Privacy/compliance violation | Mask or exclude PII; use token references |
| Excessive logging | Storage costs balloon, signal drowns | Log business events, not data flow |
| Unstructured logs | Cannot query or alert on fields | Use structured JSON with consistent schema |
| String interpolation | Breaks structured fields, injection risk | Pass fields as metadata, not in message |
| Missing correlation IDs | Cannot trace across services | Generate and propagate trace_id everywhere |
| Alert storms | On-call fatigue, real issues buried | Use grouping, inhibition, deduplication |
| Metrics with high cardinality | Prometheus OOM, dashboard timeouts | Never use user ID or request ID as label |
NEVER Do
- NEVER log passwords, tokens, API keys, or secrets — even at DEBUG level
- NEVER use console.log / print in production — use a structured logger
- NEVER use user IDs, emails, or request IDs as metric labels — cardinality will explode
- NEVER create alerts without a runbook link — unactionable alerts erode trust
- NEVER rely on logs alone — you need metrics and traces for full observability
- NEVER log request/response bodies by default — opt-in only, with PII redaction
- NEVER ignore log volume — set budgets and alert when a service exceeds daily quota
- NEVER skip context propagation in async flows — broken traces are worse than no traces
相关技能
以 AI 机器人身份加入视频会议,提供语音、虚拟形象与屏幕共享四种模式。
用 Python 库和命令行工具完成 PDF 的读取、合并、拆分、生成与内容抽取。
用目标文件里已发布的设计系统组件和变量,从代码或描述搭出整页 Figma 屏幕。
从文字、参考图或品牌线索生成 Codex 兼容的 9 状态动画宠物图集,附带 QA 联系表与 pet.json 打包。
通过 Figma Code Connect 把设计组件映射到代码文件,按名称和 props 比对后批量建关联。
wpank 的更多技能
浏览全部技能Systematic code review patterns covering security, performance, maintainability, correctness, and testing — with severity levels, structured feedback guidance, review process, and anti-patterns to avoid. Use when reviewing PRs, establishing review standards, or improving review quality.
Pragmatic coding standards for writing clean, maintainable code — naming, functions, structure, anti-patterns, and pre-edit safety checks. Use when writing new code, refactoring existing code, reviewing code quality, or establishing coding standards.
Build reliable, fast E2E test suites with Playwright and Cypress. Critical user journey coverage, flaky test elimination, CI/CD integration.
Build scalable, themable Tailwind CSS component libraries using CVA for variants, compound components, design tokens, dark mode, and responsive grids.
Create software diagrams using Mermaid syntax. Use when users need to create, visualize, or document software through diagrams including class diagrams, sequence diagrams, flowcharts, ERDs, C4 architecture diagrams, state diagrams, git graphs, and other diagram types. Triggers include requests to diagram, visualize, model, map out, or show the flow of a system.
Provides backend architecture patterns (Clean Architecture, Hexagonal, DDD) for building maintainable, testable, and scalable systems with clear layering and...