Use when medium-to-large changes need explicit requirements, technical design, and task planning before implementation, especially for multi-module work, unclear acceptance criteria, or architecture-heavy requests.
编程
Finishing a Development Branch
试用Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
它能做什么
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
技能文档
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
The Process
Step 1: Verify Tests
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing ( failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Determine Base Branch
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"
Step 3: Present Options
Present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Don't add explanation - keep options concise.
Step 4: Execute Choice
Option 1: Merge Locally
# Switch to base branch
git checkout
# Pull latest
git pull
# Merge feature branch
git merge
# Verify tests on merged result
# If tests pass
git branch -d
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Option 2: Push and Create PR
# Push branch
git push -u origin
# Create PR
gh pr create --title "" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>
## Test Plan
- [ ]
EOF
)"
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Option 3: Keep As-Is
Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."
Don't cleanup worktree.
Option 4: Discard
Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch
- All commits:
- Worktree at
Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for exact confirmation.
If confirmed:
git checkout
git branch -D
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Step 5: Cleanup Worktree
For Options 1, 2, 4:
Check if in worktree:
git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)
If yes:
git worktree remove
For Option 3: Keep worktree.
Quick Reference
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ |
| 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - |
| 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) |
Common Mistakes
Skipping test verification
- Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
- Fix: Always verify tests before offering options
Open-ended questions
- Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
- Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options
Automatic worktree cleanup
- Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
- Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4
No confirmation for discard
- Problem: Accidentally delete work
- Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation
Red Flags
Never:
- Proceed with failing tests
- Merge without verifying tests on result
- Delete work without confirmation
- Force-push without explicit request
Always:
- Verify tests before offering options
- Present exactly 4 options
- Get typed confirmation for Option 4
- Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only
Integration
Called by:
- subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
- executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete
Pairs with:
- using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill
相关技能
govern execution hygiene for software projects. use when the user wants help enforcing git commit discipline, deciding whether work is ready to commit, gener...
4-stage code-change workflow: research → plan → user review → implement (TDD). Topics — steps (Step 0-3: resume + research + plan + review + branch), implement (Step 4: TDD + build + commit), pr (capture + PR with image/GIF/video). For issue implementation, tracked tasks, new features. TDD default (opt out --no-tdd). github-flow auto-companion on GitHub repos. Use when: "coding workflow", "research plan implement", "write plan", "plan md", "user review", "code plan", "code changes", "PR with screenshots", "pull request", "capture and PR".
根据风险信号决定先规划还是直接执行,并按风险等级匹配规划深度,包含步骤、估算与回滚。
Generate first-draft technical documentation from code analysis
把项目从最初的想法一路跟到归档,每周复盘把停滞的挑出来。
zlc000190 的更多技能
浏览全部技能Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.