记忆

Figma Component Audit

试用

Audit a Figma component library for consistency, coverage gaps, and naming issues. Use when asked to audit components, review a design system, check componen...

它能做什么

Audit a Figma component library for consistency, coverage gaps, and naming issues. Use when asked to audit components, review a design system, check component consistency, identify missing components, or assess Figma library health. Produces a structured audit report with issues prioritised by impact, naming recommendations, and a fix plan.

技能文档

Figma Component Audit Skill

Produces a structured audit of a Figma component library — identifying inconsistencies, naming problems, coverage gaps, and prioritised recommendations.

Required Inputs

  • Component list or description (paste component names or describe what exists)
  • Product type (mobile app / web app / desktop / multi-platform)
  • Design system maturity (new / growing / mature / legacy)
  • Primary concern (optional)

Output Structure

1. Audit Summary

DimensionStatusScore
Naming consistencyRed/Amber/Green/10
Component coverage/10
Variant completeness/10
Documentation/10
Overall health/10

Verdict: What is the state of this library and the single most important thing to fix?

2. Naming Issues

For each problem: Issue: [Problem type]

  • What is happening: [Specific examples]
  • Why it matters: [Impact on designers and developers]
  • Fix: [Exact naming convention to adopt]
  • Examples: Before / After

Naming convention to enforce:

  • Components: PascalCase (NavigationBar)
  • Variants: Lowercase with slashes (size/large, state/hover)
  • Pages: All caps (COMPONENTS, FOUNDATIONS)

3. Coverage Gaps

Missing ComponentPriorityWhy Needed
[Component]High/Medium/Low[Use case]

4. Variant Completeness Check

ComponentDefaultHoverActiveDisabledErrorMissing
[Button]YesYesNoYesNoActive, Error

5. Prioritised Fix Plan

#FixEffortImpactDo First?
1[Fix]Low/Med/HighHighYes

Quality Checks

  • Naming recommendations have before/after examples
  • Coverage gaps are relevant to the product type
  • Fix plan is ordered by impact-to-effort ratio
  • Variant completeness covers all interactive states

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not flag naming issues without providing a specific, consistent naming convention to adopt
  • Do not audit only visual consistency — also check for missing interactive states and accessibility compliance
  • Do not list all issues at equal priority — group by impact (Critical / Major / Minor) so the fix plan is actionable
  • Do not omit variant completeness — every interactive component must cover all required states
  • Do not leave coverage gaps without recommending specific missing components to add

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Audit my Figma component library"
  • "Review our design system for consistency issues"
  • "What components are we missing in our Figma library?"
  • "Our component naming is a mess — help me fix it"
  • "Do a health check on our Figma components"

相关技能

Audit a design system for consistency, coverage, and quality. Use when asked to audit a design system, review a component library, assess design token covera...

Runs a pre-handoff QA checklist on a Figma design before it goes to engineering. Use when asked to QA a Figma design, do a pre-handoff check, or validate a F...

Runs a structured PM design review against product requirements. Use when asked to review a Figma design, check a design against requirements, or assess whet...

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG com...

Runs a PM-perspective design critique focused on product outcomes and user goals, not aesthetics. Use when asked for a PM design critique, a product review o...

Security and compliance auditing tool for AI agents. Scans code for vulnerabilities, checks GDPR/CCPA compliance, generates risk reports with remediation guidance.