设计与多媒体

Ad Account Auditor

试用

Use when auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity before scaling; runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile wi...

它能做什么

Use when auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity before scaling; runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate on own exported data. Not for campaign structure design — use campaign-architect; not for creative production — use ad-creative-builder. 付费广告账户审计/ROAS评分

技能文档

Ad Account Auditor

Audit one paid-media account or portfolio for incremental contribution and operating quality under declared constraints. Platform-reported ROAS is one input, never the objective or truth set by itself.

When This Must Trigger

  • Before launching, materially increasing spend, or changing a risky bid/targeting strategy.
  • When tracking, attribution inflation, unsafe placements, claims, or wasted spend are in doubt.
  • When the user requests a ROAS/RQS account audit from their exports.

Quick Start

Audit this USD account for direct response using 7-day click, 3-day lag, and $120 CAC ceiling.
Run the incremental-profit profile against the holdout and order-ID exports.

Skill Contract

Reads: one normalized account/portfolio evidence set. Writes: only a permissioned v3 artifact. Done when: required context and all 20 states are explicit, vetoes use verified evidence, and scorer output is reported without executing spend changes.

This skill judges. conversion-signal-qa, attribution-reconciler, campaign-architect, ad-creative-builder, and budget-pacing-monitor build/fix the inputs. Never enable campaigns, change bids, upload audiences, or scale budgets without separate explicit approval.

Data Sources

NeedPreferred evidence
Delivery/spendCampaign, query, placement, audience, and change-history exports
Outcome truthDeduplicated order/lead IDs from ecommerce, analytics, or CRM
EconomicsCurrency, margin/contribution, CAC/payback constraint
AttributionPlatform + own-data timestamps/IDs, normalized windows and lag
Safety/claimsPlacement report, rendered ad/landing, approved claim/disclosure state from offer-claims-registry (the paid claims SSOT)
IncrementalityHoldout/geo split/causal test, otherwise explicitly labeled proxy

Instructions

Runtime and Setup

Read ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, roas-benchmark.md, and the ROAS catalog entry. Standalone installs use bundled immutable references/auditor-runtime.md; never fetch mutable main. Before deterministic calls, follow runtime-invocation.md, resolve AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If unavailable, return score_state: NOT_SCORED / score_confidence: not_scored with no gate verdict or persistent artifact.

Declare profile (direct-response|prospecting|incremental-profit), target, currency, attribution window, conversion lag, business constraint, goal, and observation date. If any required context is missing, return NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED.

Evidence and Scoring

  1. Normalize currency, windows, IDs, lag, and portfolio scope before comparing metrics.
  2. Score all 20 R1..S5 criteria from the benchmark with source/date/type/confidence.
  3. Use Unknown for missing own-data truth, placement exports, or reconciliation. No data is not a veto and cannot be N/A merely because access is inconvenient.
  4. Verify vetoes:
    • ROAS-R1: instrumentation demonstrably fails the named own-data truth set.
    • ROAS-R2: material double-counting/inflation is demonstrated.
    • ROAS-O1: material claim/disclosure failure against the offer-claims-registry approved state.
    • ROAS-O2: applicable platform/restricted-category violation.
    • ROAS-A1: placement evidence demonstrates a material safety breach.
  5. Run the typed scorer. Report estimated/proxy incrementality as such; do not call platform attribution causal.

§2 ROAS Worked Examples

  • Complete direct-response profile, raw 78, no veto/fail: DONE/SHIP, final 78.
  • Complete profile, raw 78, one verified R1 failure: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX, final 59.
  • Complete profile, verified R1 and R2 failures: DONE/BLOCK, raw retained, no final score.
  • Missing placement report: A1 Unknown, NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED, no overall score.

§3 ROAS Guardrails

  • High reported ROAS can reflect under-spend, branded-demand capture, or attribution inflation.
  • Learning-phase disruption is an S2 finding, not an automatic veto.
  • ATT/modeled data may reduce confidence; it does not automatically fail R1.
  • Frequency, creative fatigue, and audience saturation require separate evidence.
  • Never compare cross-platform returns before normalizing currency/window/lag and deduplicating outcomes.

§5 ROAS Translation

Lead with business impact and evidence. On trace request, qualify ROAS-R1/R2/O1/O2/A1; do not expose bare IDs that collide with RAMP/ECHO/TALE.

Report and Verdict

Begin with the auditor-runbook's exact typed conversation header. Never replace status, verdict, or score_state with prose; list each explicitly missing qualified item as ``ID: `unknown``` before findings.

Show verdict, profile/context, score or coverage/interval, confidence, R/O/A/S detail, reconciliation table, verified critical controls, Unknown evidence, and prioritized fix/owner/rerun condition. The scorer owns status/verdict and the 59 ceiling.

Validation Checkpoints

  • Scope/currency/window/lag/constraint/goal are explicit.
  • Own-data outcome truth is separated from platform self-report.
  • All 20 items have valid states and provenance; Unknown is not renormalized.
  • Veto failures are positively verified.
  • No spend/account mutation occurred without separate approval.

Persistence

Persist only after explicit authorization to memory/audits/ad/YYYY-MM-DD-.md. Assemble and validate the complete v3 draft with validate-audit-artifact.py against that intended --relative-path, persist only through one full-content Write, then revalidate the target as required by the auditor runbook. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Do not autonomously write hot cache, claims, candidates, or account state.

Reference Materials

  • ROAS benchmark
  • Measurement protocol
  • Auditor runbook
  • Scoring semantics

Next Best Skill

  • Tracking: conversion-signal-qa
  • Claims/disclosures: offer-claims-registry — the approved claim/disclosure state behind ROAS-O1
  • Attribution: attribution-reconciler
  • Structure/audience: campaign-architect
  • Pacing: budget-pacing-monitor

相关技能

Use when the user asks to "plan my paid account structure", "pick Search vs PMax", "lay out ad groups / asset groups", or "audit paid-vs-organic cannibalizat...

Use when the user asks to "audit an email program" or "is this campaign safe to send"; runs a typed 20-item SEND profile with authentication, consent, opt-ou...

Audit an existing social media account and its content — the retrospective reality-check of what's working and what isn't. Use when someone wants to "audit m...

1 次安装

Use when the user asks to "read back" a paid campaign change, "did this ad change work", or "compare ROAS/CPA before and after"; reads ROAS/CPA against a con...

1 次安装

Audit creator/influencer performance for commerce teams — score creators on reach quality, engagement authenticity, conversion contribution, and cost efficiency, then output a keep/scale/renegotiate/drop decision with evidence.

17 次安装

Use when the user asks to "audit our brand narrative" or "is this message on-canon"; runs separate typed TALE truth, system, or effectiveness profiles and ne...